• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Vann McGee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    88
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    2
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
    Retired faculty
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Language
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Mathematics
Philosophy of Probability
  • All publications (88)
  •  123
    Review: John Etchemendy, The Concept of Logical Consequence
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1): 254-255. 1992.
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic
  •  1292
    A counterexample to modus ponens
    Journal of Philosophy 82 (9): 462-471. 1985.
    Logic of Conditionals
  •  172
    Learning the Impossible
    In Ellery Eells & Brian Skyrms (eds.), Probability and Conditionals: Belief Revision and Rational Decision, Cambridge University Press. pp. 179-199. 1994.
    Conditional ProbabilityDegrees of BeliefPrior Probabilities
  •  636
    How we learn mathematical language
    Philosophical Review 106 (1): 35-68. 1997.
    Mathematical realism is the doctrine that mathematical objects really exist, that mathematical statements are either determinately true or determinately false, and that the accepted mathematical axioms are predominantly true. A realist understanding of set theory has it that when the sentences of the language of set theory are understood in their standard meaning, each sentence has a determinate truth value, so that there is a fact of the matter whether the cardinality of the continuum is א2 or …Read more
    Mathematical realism is the doctrine that mathematical objects really exist, that mathematical statements are either determinately true or determinately false, and that the accepted mathematical axioms are predominantly true. A realist understanding of set theory has it that when the sentences of the language of set theory are understood in their standard meaning, each sentence has a determinate truth value, so that there is a fact of the matter whether the cardinality of the continuum is א2 or whether there are measurable cardinals, whether or not those facts are knowable by us.
    British PhilosophyAustrian Philosophy
  •  193
    We Turing machines aren't expected-utility maximizers (even ideally)
    Philosophical Studies 64 (1). 1991.
    Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence
  •  240
    Review of K. Fine, The Limits of Abstraction
    Philosophia Mathematica 12 (3): 278-284. 2004.
    Mathematical Neo-FregeanismPhilosophy of Mathematics, Misc
  •  413
    To tell the Truth about Conditionals
    Analysis 60 (1): 107-111. 2000.
    Indicative Conditionals and Conditional ProbabilitiesIndicative Conditionals, MiscEpistemic Accounts…Read more
    Indicative Conditionals and Conditional ProbabilitiesIndicative Conditionals, MiscEpistemic Accounts of Indicative Conditionals
  •  2
    The analysis of" a; is true" as
    In André Leon Jo Chapuis & Anil Gupta (eds.), Circularity, Definition and Truth, Sole Distributor, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. pp. 255. 2000.
  •  64
    S. N. Artemov. Arithmetically complete modal theories. Six papers in logic, American Mathematical Society translations, ser. 2 vol. 135, American Mathematical Society, Providence1987, pp. 39–54. , vol. 14 , pp. 115–133.) - S. N. Artemov. On modal logics axiomatizing provability. Mathematics of the USSR—Izvestiya, vol. 27 no. 3 , pp. 401–429. , pp. 1123–1154.) - S. N. Artemov. Nonarithmeticity of truth predicate logics of provability. Soviet mathematics—Doklady, vol. 32 , pp. 403–405. , pp. 270–271.) - V. A. Vardanyan. Arithmetic complexity of predicate logics of provability and their fragments. Soviet mathematics—Doklady, vol. 33 no. 3 , pp. 569–572. , pp. 11–14.) - S. N. Artemov. Numerically correct provability logics. Soviet mathematics—Doklady, vol. 34 , pp. 384–387. , pp. 1289–1292.)
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1): 329-332. 1991.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogics
  •  164
    Revision
    Philosophical Issues 8 387-406. 1997.
    Liar ParadoxFormal EpistemologyRevision Theory of Truth
  •  164
    The degree of the set of sentences of predicate provability logic that are true under every interpretation
    with George Boolos
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1): 165-171. 1987.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogics
  •  246
    Logical commitment and semantic indeterminacy: A reply to Williamson
    with Brian P. Mclaughlin
    Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (1): 123-136. 2004.
    Many-Valued LogicEpistemic Theories of VaguenessSemantics
  •  328
    Field’s logic of truth
    Philosophical Studies 147 (3): 421-432. 2010.
    Liar Paradox
  • Truth, Vagueness and Paradox. An Essay on the Logic of Truth
    Studia Logica 51 (2): 340-341. 1992.
    Logical Semantics and Logical TruthParadoxes
  •  91
    Book reviews (review)
    Mind 102 (408): 518-. 1993.
  •  135
    The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity
    Philosophical Review 100 (3): 472. 1991.
    Liar Paradox
  •  99
    Review: Two Conceptions of Truth? Comment (review)
    Philosophical Studies 124 (1). 2005.
    Truth
  •  165
    Applying Kripke's Theory of Truth
    Journal of Philosophy 86 (10): 530-539. 1989.
    Liar ParadoxTheories of Truth, Misc
  •  247
    Maximal consistent sets of instances of Tarski’s schema
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (3). 1992.
    Liar ParadoxTarskian Theories of Truth
  •  387
    Inscrutability and its discontents
    Noûs 39 (3). 2005.
    That reference is inscrutable is demonstrated, it is argued, not only by W. V. Quine's arguments but by Peter Unger's "Problem of the Many." Applied to our own language, this is a paradoxical result, since nothing could be more obvious to speakers of English than that, when they use the word "rabbit," they are talking about rabbits. The solution to this paradox is to take a disquotational view of reference for one's own language, so that "When I use 'rabbit,' I refer to rabbits" is made true by …Read more
    That reference is inscrutable is demonstrated, it is argued, not only by W. V. Quine's arguments but by Peter Unger's "Problem of the Many." Applied to our own language, this is a paradoxical result, since nothing could be more obvious to speakers of English than that, when they use the word "rabbit," they are talking about rabbits. The solution to this paradox is to take a disquotational view of reference for one's own language, so that "When I use 'rabbit,' I refer to rabbits" is made true by the meaning of the word "refer." The reference relation is extended to other languages by translation. The explanation for this peculiarly egocentric conception of semantics-questions of others' meanings are settled by asking what I mean by words of my language-is to be found in our practice of predicting and explaining other people's behavior by empathetic identification. I understand other people's behavior by asking what I would do in their place
    The Model-Theoretic ArgumentThe Indeterminacy of TranslationIndeterminacy and Inscrutability of Refe…Read more
    The Model-Theoretic ArgumentThe Indeterminacy of TranslationIndeterminacy and Inscrutability of ReferenceDisquotationalism about TruthDeflationism about Truth, Misc
  •  83
    2000 Annual Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic
    with A. Pillay, D. Hallett, G. Hjorth, C. Jockusch, A. Kanamori, and H. J. Keisler
    Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (3): 361-396. 2000.
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Misc
  •  449
    Distinctions Without a Difference
    with Brian McLaughlin
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (S1): 203-251. 1995.
    Supervaluationism
  •  112
    Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth
    Hackett. 1990.
    Awarded the 1988 Johnsonian Prize in Philosophy. Published with the aid of a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
    Liar Paradox
  •  32
    Afterword: Trying (With Limited Success) to Demarcate the Disquotational-Correspondence Distinction
    In Bradley P. Armour-Garb & J. C. Beall (eds.), Deflationary Truth, Open Court Press. pp. 143-152. 2005.
    Disquotationalism about Truth
  •  6
    There's a Rule for Everything
    In Agustín Rayo & Gabriel Uzquiano (eds.), Absolute generality, Oxford University Press. pp. 179--202. 2006.
    Unrestricted Quantification
  •  33
    Ramsey and the Correspondence Theory
    In Volker Halbach & Leon Horsten (eds.), Principles of truth, Hänsel-hohenhausen. pp. 153-168. 2002.
    Correspondence Theory of Truth
  • Structures and the Hyperarithmetical Hierarchy. Knight has directed or co-directed seven doctoral dissertations in mathematics and one in electrical engineering. She served on selection panels for the NSF Postdoctoral Fellowships, on program committees of numerous meetings, and as an editor of The Journal of Symbolic Logic (1989-1995) (review)
    with D. Haskell, G. Hjorth, C. Jockusch, A. Kanamori, H. J. Keisler, and T. Pitassi
    Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (1). 2000.
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  180
    Logic, Logic, and Logic
    Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1): 58-62. 2001.
    LogicsLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback