-
14Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishingMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (4): 499-503. 2023.Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors might use AI in a variety of ways, and those uses might augment their existing work or might instead be intended to replace it. We are editors of bioethics and humanities journals who have been contemplating the implications of this ongoing transformation. We believe that generative AI may pose a threat to the goals that animate our work but could also…Read more
-
12Beyond the IRB: Local Service Versus Global OversightAmerican Journal of Bioethics 11 (5): 1-2. 2011.
-
12The Proper Locus of Professionalization: The Individual or the Institutions?American Journal of Bioethics 15 (5): 1-2. 2015.
-
12Correction: Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishingMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (4): 505-505. 2023.
-
12Innocent Fun or “Microslavery”?Hastings Center Report 44 (6): 38-46. 2014.In 2011, Ingmar Riedel‐Kruse's bioengineering laboratory at Stanford University publicized an application that uses paramecia for what the researchers termed “biotic games.” These games make use of living organisms, computer programs, and lab equipment to implement games like Pong, Pac‐man, and soccer. Gamesand related activities are often considered nonserious or trivial, whereas life, biological systems, and science are treated very seriously in moral analysis and public perception. The manipu…Read more
-
11The Potential Harms and Benefits from Research on Medical PracticesHastings Center Report 45 (3): 5-6. 2015.A commentary on “SUPPORT and the Ethics of Study Implementation: Lessons for Comparative Effectiveness Research from the Trial of Oxygen Therapy for Premature Babies,” by John D. Lantos and Chris Feudtner, in the January‐February 2015 issue.
-
11Disability, Aging, and the Importance of Recognizing Social Supports in Medical Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Bioethics 21 (11): 1-3. 2021.The two target articles in this issue draw an important connection between disability bioethics and geriatric bioethics. Dominic JC Wilkinson makes a pragmatic case for using frailty as a fa...
-
10The History of The American Journal of BioethicsAmerican Journal of Bioethics 10 (10): 3-3. 2010.This Article does not have an abstract
-
10Editors’ Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal PublishingAmerican Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (4): 337-340. 2023.The new generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, and especially the large language models (LLMs) of which ChatGPT is the most prominent example, have the potential to transform many aspects o...
-
10The Limits of Individualism: Potential Societal Harms from the EAP for Convalescent PlasmaAmerican Journal of Bioethics 20 (9): 1-3. 2020.Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2020, Page 1-3.
-
10Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics ConsultationAmerican Journal of Bioethics 16 (3): 1-2. 2016.
-
9Dimensions of Research-Participant Interaction: Engagement is Not a Replacement for ConsentJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1): 183-184. 2020.
-
8Using Implementation Science to Enact Specific Ethical Norms: The Case of Code Status PolicyAmerican Journal of Bioethics 20 (4): 6-7. 2020.Volume 20, Issue 4, May 2020, Page 6-7.
-
6Technik, Ereignis, Material: neue Perspektiven auf Ontologie, Aisthesis und Ethik der stofflichen Welt (edited book)Kulturverlag Kadmos. 2019.
-
4The SUPPORT Controversy and the Debate Over Research Within the Standard of CareAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (12): 1-2. 2013.No abstract
-
3Politics and Peer reviewAmerican Journal of Bioethics 4 (1). 2004.This Article does not have an abstract
-
In Defense of Natural History: David Starr Jordan and the Role of Isolation in EvolutionDissertation, Stanford University. 1993.Philosophers and historians of science have tended to denigrate the status and usefulness of the practice of natural history. The development of biology in this century is seen as the replacement of an older, descriptive and speculative method with a quantitative, experimental and well-founded science. This account embodies a philosophical view about the nature of science, which deems certain kinds of evidence and certain ways of producing knowledge appropriate. Natural history is seen as inadeq…Read more
-
Biology & epistemologyIn Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Biology and Epistemology, Cambridge University Press. 2000.