-
61Desert, Bell Motion, and FairnessCriminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3): 639-655. 2016.In this critical review, I address two themes from Shelly Kagan’s path-breaking The Geometry of Desert. First I explain the so-called “bell motion” of desert mountains—a notion reflecting that, ceteris paribus, as people get more virtuous it becomes more important not to give them too little of whatever they deserve than not to give them too much. Having argued that Kagan’s defense of it is unsatisfactory, I offer two objections to the existence of the bell motion. Second, I take up an unrelated…Read more
-
95Moral Status and the Impermissibility of Minimizing ViolationsPhilosophy and Public Affairs 25 (4): 333-351. 1996.
-
17Book Review: World Poverty and Human Rights (review)Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1): 97-99. 2006.
-
6The insignificance of the distinction between telic and deontic egalitarianismIn Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality, Clarendon Press. 2006.
-
26Hurley on reason‐responsiveness, regression, and responsibilityPhilosophical Books 46 (3): 199-209. 2005.
-
562Immigrants, Multiculturalism, and Expensive Cultural Tastes: Quong on Luck Egalitarianism and Cultural Minority RightsLes ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 6 (2): 176-192. 2011.Kymlicka has offered an influential luck egalitarian justification for a catalogue of polyethnic rights addressing cultural disadvantages of immigrant minorities. In response, Quong argues that while the items on the list are justified, in the light of the fact that the relevant disadvantages of immigrants result from their choice to immigrate, (i) these rights cannot be derived from luck egalitarianism and (ii) that this casts doubt on luck egalitarianism as a theory of cultural justice. As an …Read more
-
39Gene Therapy and Ethics: Edited by A Nordgren. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 1999, 208 SEK, pp 175. ISBN 915544640X (review)Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (1): 58-2. 2002.Gene therapy research and its clinical application raise a large number of ethical, legal, and social questions. Many of these are discussed in Nordgren's anthology. The contributions come from a number of different disciplines, including bioethics, genetics, social science, and theology. The book is divided into five main sections (following a short introduction): scientific aspects of gene therapy; the history of, and prospects for, gene therapy; conceptual issues; gene therapy in a German and…Read more
-
24Review of Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare (review)Economics and Philosophy 27 (2): 208-215. 2011.
-
47Dispositional neutrality and minority rightsCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (1): 49-62. 2017.
-
140Born Free and Equal? A Philosophical Inquiry Into the Nature of DiscriminationOxford University Press. 2013.This book addresses these three issues: What is discrimination?; What makes it wrong?; What should be done about wrongful discrimination? It argues: that there are different concepts of discrimination; that discrimination is not always morally wrong and that when it is, it is so primarily because of its harmful effects.
-
55Life-prolonging killings and their relevance to ethicsEthical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2): 135-147. 1999.What makes killing morally wrong? And what makes killing morally worse than letting die? Standard answers to these two questions presuppose that killing someone involves shortening that person's life. Yet, as I argue in the first two sections of this article, this presupposition is false: Life-prolonging killings are conceivable. In the last two sections of the article, I explore the significance of the conceivability of such killings for various discussions of the two questions just mentioned. …Read more
-
104‘To Serve and Protect’: The Ends of Harm by Victor Tadros (review)Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1): 49-71. 2015.In The Ends of Harm Victor Tadros develops an alternative to consequentialist, and non-consequentialist retributivist, accounts of the justifiability of punishment: the duty view. Crucial to this view is the claim that wrongdoers incur an enforceable duty to remedy their wrongs. They cannot undo them, but they can do something that is almost as good—namely, by submitting to appropriate punishment, which will deter potential wrongdoers in the future, reduce their victim’s risk of suffering simila…Read more
-
106Are Enabling and Allowing Harm Morally Equivalent?Utilitas 27 (3): 365-383. 2015.It is sometimes asserted that enabling harm is morally equivalent to allowing harm. In this article, I criticize this view. Positively, I show that cases involving self-defence and cases involving people acting on the basis of a reasonable belief to the effect that certain obstacles to harm will remain in place, or will be put in place, show that enabling harm is harder to justify than allowing it. Negatively, I argue that certain cases offered in defence of the moral equivalence thesis fail, be…Read more
-
20Justice, Institutions, and Luck: The Site, Ground, and Scope of Equality, by Kok-Chor TanMind 123 (490): 653-656. 2014.
-
192Identification and responsibilityEthical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4): 349-376. 2003.Real-self accounts of moral responsibility distinguish between various types of motivational elements. They claim that an agent is responsible for acts suitably related to elements that constitute the agent's real self. While such accounts have certain advantages from a compatibilist perspective, they are problematic in various ways. First, in it, authority and authenticity conceptions of the real self are often inadequately distinguished. Both of these conceptions inform discourse on identifica…Read more
-
29
-
190Estlund on Epistocracy: A Critique (review)Res Publica 18 (3): 241-258. 2012.An influential anti-democratic argument says: ‘(1) Answers to political questions are truth-apt. (2) A small elite only—the epistocrats—knows these truths. (3) If answers to political questions are truth-apt, then those with this knowledge about these matters should rule. (4) Thus, epistocrats should rule.’ Many democrats have responded by denying (1), arguing that, say, answers to political questions are a matter of sheer personal preference. Others have rejected (2), contending that knowledge …Read more
-
37On Denying A Significant Version Of The Constancy AssumptionTheoria 65 (2-3): 90-113. 1999.With regard to intrinsically morally relevant factors it is natural to suppose that if a variation in a given factor makes a moral difference anywhere, then it makes the same moral difference everywhere (henceforth: the constancy assumption). Jonathan Dancy (and other moral particularists) reject the constancy assumption. Partly on the basis thereof, they infer that ethical decisions should be made “case by case, without the comforting support of moral principles”. In this article, I challenge D…Read more
-
5Discrimination : discrimination : what is it and what makes it morally wrong?In Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen & Clark Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics, Palgrave-macmillan. 2007.
-
34Ethics, organ donation and tax: a proposalJournal of Medical Ethics 38 (8): 451-457. 2012.Next SectionFive arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These objections focus upon no-effect and counter-productiveness, the Titmuss concern about social meaning, exploitation of the poor, commodification, inequality and unequal status, the notion …Read more
-
92Are some inequalities more unequal than others? Nature, nurture and equalityUtilitas 16 (2): 193-219. 2004.Many egalitarians believe that social inequalities are worse than natural ones. Others deny that one can coherently distinguish between them. I argue that although one can separate the influence of these factors by an analysis of variance, the distinction is morally irrelevant. It might be alleged that my argument in favour of moral irrelevance attacks a straw man. While I think this allegation is incorrect, I accommodate it by distinguishing between four claims that are related to, and sometime…Read more
-
57Luck egalitarianism: Equality, responsibility, and justice * by Carl KnightAnalysis 70 (4): 804-805. 2010.(No abstract is available for this citation)
-
6The posthuman condition: ethics, aesthetics and politics of biotechnological challenges (edited book)Aarhus University Press ;. 2012.If biotechnology can be used to "upgrade" humans physically and mentally, should it be done? And if so, to what extent? How will biotechnology affect societal cohesion, and can the development be controlled? Or is this a Pandora's box that should remain closed? These are just a few of the many questions that arise as a result of the increasing ability of technology to change biology and, eventually, transform human living conditions. This development has created a new horizon of a posthuman futu…Read more