-
212“We are all Different”: Statistical Discrimination and the Right to be Treated as an IndividualThe Journal of Ethics 15 (1): 47-59. 2011.There are many objections to statistical discrimination in general and racial profiling in particular. One objection appeals to the idea that people have a right to be treated as individuals. Statistical discrimination violates this right because, presumably, it involves treating people simply on the basis of statistical facts about groups to which they belong while ignoring non-statistical evidence about them. While there is something to this objection—there are objectionable ways of treating o…Read more
-
85Inequality, incentives and the interpersonal testRatio 21 (4): 421-439. 2008.This article defends three claims: even if Rawls' difference principle permits incentives to induce talented people to be more productive, it does not follow that it permits inequalities; the difference principle, when adequately specified, may in some circumstances permit incentives and allow that the worst off are not made as well off as they could be; and an argument for incentives might pass Cohen's interpersonal test even if it is unsound and might not pass it even if it is sound. 1
-
158The badness of discriminationEthical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2): 167-185. 2006.The most blatant forms of discrimination are morally outrageous and very obviously so; but the nature and boundaries of discrimination are more controversial, and it is not clear whether all forms of discrimination are morally bad; nor is it clear why objectionable cases of discrimination are bad. In this paper I address these issues. First, I offer a taxonomy of discrimination. I then argue that discrimination is bad, when it is, because it harms people. Finally, I criticize a rival, disrespect…Read more
-
58Understanding ParticularismTheoria 71 (2): 118-137. 2005.Adherents of particularism draw rather strong implications of this view. However, particularism has never been stated in a canonical way. We locate the core of particularism as a claim about how different reasons combine to generate the Tightness or wrongness of an action. Using the notion of an ordering of alternatives containing separable factors, we show that particularism can be stated more generally as the denial that there exist separable factors.With this definition in place, we show that…Read more
-
49Genetic Discrimination and Health InsuranceRes Publica 21 (2): 185-199. 2015.According to US law, insurance companies can lawfully differentiate individual health insurance premiums on the basis of non-genetic medical information, but not on the basis of genetic information. The article reviews the case for such genetic exceptionalism. First, I critically assess some standard justifications. Next, I scrutinize an argument appealing to the view that genetically based premium differentiation expresses that persons do not all merit equal concern and respect. In the final se…Read more
-
10Does Moral Responsibility Presuppose Alternate Possibilities?In A. van den Beld (ed.), Moral Responsibility and Ontology, Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 89--101. 2000.
-
51Luck-Egalitarianism: Faults and Collective ChoiceEconomics and Philosophy 27 (2): 151-173. 2011.A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair – for some to be worse off than others [through no fault or choice of their own]’, where ‘fault or choice’ means substantive responsibility-generating fault or choice. This formulation is ambiguous: one ambiguity concerns the possible existence of a gap between what is true of each worse-off individual and what is true of the group of worse-off individuals, fault or choice-wise, the other concerns …Read more
-
46Benjamin Eidelson, Discrimination and Disrespect: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Hardcover € 48,30. pp. 267Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2): 451-454. 2017.
-
6The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Discrimination (edited book)Routledge. 2017.While it has many connections to other topics in normative and applied ethics, discrimination is a central subject in philosophy in its own right. It plays a significant role in relation to many real-life complaints about unjust treatment or unjust inequalities, and it raises a number of questions in political and moral philosophy, and in legal theory. Some of these questions include: what distinguishes the concept of discrimination from the concept of differential treatment? What distinguishes …Read more
-
80Legitimate allocation of public healthcare: Beyond accountability for reasonablenessPublic Health Ethics 2 (1): 59-69. 2009.PhD, Institute of Public Health, Unit of Medical Philosophy and Clinical Theory, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099 1014 Copenhagen. Tel: +45 30 32 33 63; Email: s.lauridsen{at}pubhealth.ku.dk ' + u + '@ ' + d + ' '/ /- ->Citizens’ consent to political decisions is often regarded as a necessary condition of political legitimacy. Consequently, legitimate allocation of healthcare has seemed almost unattainable in contemporary pluralistic societies. The problem is that ci…Read more
-
245Intentions and Discrimination in HiringJournal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1): 55-74. 2012.Fundamentally, intentions do not matter to the permissibility of actions, according to Thomas Scanlon (among others). Yet, discriminatory intentions seem essential to certain kinds of direct discrimination in hiring and firing, and appear to be something by virtue of which, in part at least, these kinds of discrimination are morally impermissible. Scanlon's account of the wrongness of discrimination attempts to accommodate this appearance through the notion of the expressive meaning of discrimin…Read more
-
430An introduction to contemporary egalitarianismIn Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: new essays on the nature and value of equality, Clarendon Press. pp. 1--37. 2007.
-
62Desert, Bell Motion, and FairnessCriminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3): 639-655. 2016.In this critical review, I address two themes from Shelly Kagan’s path-breaking The Geometry of Desert. First I explain the so-called “bell motion” of desert mountains—a notion reflecting that, ceteris paribus, as people get more virtuous it becomes more important not to give them too little of whatever they deserve than not to give them too much. Having argued that Kagan’s defense of it is unsatisfactory, I offer two objections to the existence of the bell motion. Second, I take up an unrelated…Read more
-
58Moral Status and the Impermissibility of Minimizing ViolationsPhilosophy and Public Affairs 25 (4): 333-351. 1996.
-
4Book Review: World Poverty and Human Rights (review)Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1): 97-99. 2006.
-
589Immigrants, Multiculturalism, and Expensive Cultural Tastes: Quong on Luck Egalitarianism and Cultural Minority RightsLes ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 6 (2): 176-192. 2011.Kymlicka has offered an influential luck egalitarian justification for a catalogue of polyethnic rights addressing cultural disadvantages of immigrant minorities. In response, Quong argues that while the items on the list are justified, in the light of the fact that the relevant disadvantages of immigrants result from their choice to immigrate, (i) these rights cannot be derived from luck egalitarianism and (ii) that this casts doubt on luck egalitarianism as a theory of cultural justice. As an …Read more
-
6The insignificance of the distinction between telic and deontic egalitarianismIn Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: new essays on the nature and value of equality, Clarendon Press. 2007.
-
26Hurley on reason‐responsiveness, regression, and responsibilityPhilosophical Books 46 (3): 199-209. 2005.
-
15Gene Therapy and Ethics: Edited by A Nordgren. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 1999, 208 SEK, pp 175. ISBN 915544640X (review)Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (1): 58-2. 2002.Gene therapy research and its clinical application raise a large number of ethical, legal, and social questions. Many of these are discussed in Nordgren's anthology. The contributions come from a number of different disciplines, including bioethics, genetics, social science, and theology. The book is divided into five main sections (following a short introduction): scientific aspects of gene therapy; the history of, and prospects for, gene therapy; conceptual issues; gene therapy in a German and…Read more
-
11Review of Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare (review)Economics and Philosophy 27 (2): 208-215. 2011.
-
47Dispositional neutrality and minority rightsCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (1): 49-62. 2017.