-
Reasoning with Arbitrary ObjectsRevue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (3): 402-403. 1985.
-
72Model Theory for Modal Logic. Part I--the de Re/De Dicto DistinctionJournal of Symbolic Logic 50 (4): 1083-1093. 1985.
-
24Failures of the Interpolation Lemma in Quantified Modal LogicJournal of Symbolic Logic 48 (2): 486-488. 1983.
-
249Comments on Scott Soames’‘Coordination Problems’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2): 475-484. 2010.
-
129
-
1748Williamson on Fine on Prior on the reduction of possibilist discourseCanadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5): 548-570. 2016.I attempt to meet some criticisms that Williamson makes of my attempt to carry out Prior's project of reducing possibility discourse to actualist discourse.
-
1298Vagueness, truth and logicSynthese 30 (3-4): 265-300. 1975.This paper deals with the truth-Conditions and the logic for vague languages. The use of supervaluations and of classical logic is defended; and other approaches are criticized. The truth-Conditions are extended to a language that contains a definitely-Operator and that is subject to higher order vagueness
-
1351XIV*—Ontological DependenceProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1): 269-290. 1995.Kit Fine; XIV*—Ontological Dependence, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 95, Issue 1, 1 June 1995, Pages 269–290, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristote.
-
197What is metaphysics?In Tuomas E. Tahko (ed.), Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press. pp. 8--25. 2011.
-
412000-2001 Winter Meeting of the Association for Symbolic LogicBulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (3): 397-403. 2001.
-
1240Unified Foundations for Essence and GroundJournal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (2): 296-311. 2015.
-
88The Varieties of NecessityIn Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, Oxford University Press. pp. 235-260. 2005.It is argued that there are three fundamental forms of necessity — the metaphysical, the natural and the normative — and that none of these are reducible to the others or to any other form of necessity. It is shown that certain currently fashionable views on scientific essentialism and ethical naturalism must be given up once these distinctions are maintained.
-
628Varieties of NecessityIn Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 253-281. 2002.It is argued that there are three main forms of necessity --the metaphysical, the natural and the normative--and that none of them is reducible to the others or to any other form of necessity. In arguing for a distinctive form of natural necessity, it is necessary to refute a version of the doctrine of scientific essentialism; and in arguing for a distinctive form of normative necessity, it is necessary to refute certain traditional and contemporary versions of ethical naturalism
-
347The Silence of the Lambdas. Interview with Kit FineThe Philosophers' Magazine 55 (55): 19-27. 2011.“Mathematical objects are not exactly of our own making, but we actually have to do something to get them. There’s something out there which we prod, but there’s the prodding that’s also required. Numbers are not exactly out there or in us, but somehow in between.”
-
824Truth-Maker Semantics for Intuitionistic LogicJournal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3): 549-577. 2014.I propose a new semantics for intuitionistic logic, which is a cross between the construction-oriented semantics of Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov and the condition-oriented semantics of Kripke. The new semantics shows how there might be a common semantical underpinning for intuitionistic and classical logic and how intuitionistic logic might thereby be tied to a realist conception of the relationship between language and the world
-
8560The question of ontologyIn David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, Oxford University Press. pp. 157--177. 2009.
Kit Fine
This is a database entry with public information about a philosopher who is not a registered user of PhilPeople.