-
39What is ethics?Polity. 2020.Why be moral? -- Consequentialism -- Nonconsequentialism -- Reconciliation -- Morality and religion.
-
46Morality: The Why and the What of It: The Why and the What of ItRoutledge. 2012.Well-known philosophers from a variety of philosophical orientations vigorously discuss James Sterba's bold claims that morality is required by reason and that even a minimal morality leads to braodly egalitarian commitments--Alison M. Jaggar, on back cover.
-
232Is a good god logically possible?International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (3): 203-208. 2020.
-
143Is a Good God Logically Possible?Springer Verlag. 2019.Using yet untapped resources from moral and political philosophy, this book seeks to answer the question of whether an all good God who is presumed to be all powerful is logically compatible with the degree and amount of moral and natural evil that exists in our world. It is widely held by theists and atheists alike that it may be logically impossible for an all good, all powerful God to create a world with moral agents like ourselves that does not also have at least some moral evil in it. James…Read more
-
146Global Justice for Humans or for all Living beings and what Difference it MakesThe Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2): 283-300. 2005.I begin with an account of what is deserved in human ethics, an ethics that assumes without argument that only humans, or rational agents, count morally. I then take up the question of whether nonhuman living beings are also deserving and answer it in the affirmative. Having established that all individual living beings, as well as ecosystems, are deserving, I go on to establish what it is that they deserve and then compare the requirements of global justice when only humans are taken into accou…Read more
-
112Solving Darwin’s Problem of Natural EvilSophia 59 (3): 501-512. 2020.Charles Darwin questions whether conflicts between species palpably captured by the conflict between Ichneumonidae and the caterpillars on which they prey could be compatible with the existence of an all-good, all-powerful God. He also questioned whether the suffering of millions of lower animals throughout our almost endless prehistory could be compatible with an all-good, all-powerful God. In this paper, I show that these two problems of natural evil that Darwin raised in his work can be resol…Read more
-
150The Welfare Rights of Distant Peoples and Future GenerationsSocial Theory and Practice 7 (1): 99-119. 1981.
-
1Toulmin to RawlsIn Robert J. Cavalier, James Gouinlock & James P. Sterba (eds.), Ethics in the history of western philosophy, St. Martin's Press. pp. 399--420. 1989.
-
17The Varieties of LibertyPhilosophie Et Culture: Actes du XVIIe Congrès Mondial de Philosophie 3 588-593. 1988.
-
71Soft determinism, indetermbmism and the justification for punishmentMetaphilosophy 17 (1). 1986.
-
38Some Problems with “Making Justice Practical”Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 4 15-19. 1982.
-
159Reconciling Pacifists and Just War Theorists RevisitedSocial Theory and Practice 20 (2): 135-142. 1994.
-
115Reconciliation Reaffirmed: A Reply to SteversonEnvironmental Values 5 (4). 1996.In this reply to Brian Steverson's objections to my reconciliationist argument, I have clarified the requirements that follow from my principles of environmental justice. I have also clarified the notion of intrinsic value that I am endorsing and the grounds on which my claim of greater intrinsic value for humans rests
-
266Reconciling Anthropocentric and Nonanthropocentric Environmental EthicsEnvironmental Values 3 (3). 1994.I propose to show that when the most morally defensible versions of an anthropocentric environmental ethics and a nonanthropocentric ethics are laid out, they would lead us to accept the same principles of environmental justice
Areas of Specialization
| Value Theory |
| Other Academic Areas |
Areas of Interest
| Value Theory |
| Other Academic Areas |