-
Skeptical Theism, Atheism, and Total Evidence SkepticismIn Trent Dougherty & Justin P. McBrayer (eds.), Skeptical Theism: New Essays, Oxford University Press. pp. 209-20. 2014.This paper is a response to John Schellenberg’s paper, “Skeptical Theism and Skeptical Atheism,” in which he raises objections to theistic belief that are supposed to cause special trouble for skeptical theists. In section I, I provide some clarificatory comments concerning skeptical theism. In section II, I evaluate an atheistic argument that Schellenberg finds particularly impressive. In section III, I examine the view Schellenberg calls ‘total evidence skepticism’ and consider its bearing …Read more
-
Review of R. Douglas Geivett's Evil and the Evidence for God (review)Faith and Philosophy 13 (3): 436-41. 1996.
-
A Dilemma for InternalismIn Thomas M. Crisp, Matthew Davidson & David Vander Laan (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga, Springer. pp. 137-77. 2006.This paper presents a dilemma for internalism in epistemology—a view according to which a person’s belief is justified only if that person is aware (or potentially aware) of something that contributes to that belief’s justification. The dilemma says that either this required awareness involves conceiving of the object of awareness as contributing to the relevant belief’s justification or it does not. If it does, then internalism is saddled with vicious regress problems; if it does not, then in…Read more
-
Review of Richard Swinburne's "Epistemic Justification" (review)The Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211): 295-98. 2003.
-
Commonsense Skeptical TheismIn Clark Kelly James & Rea Michael C. (eds.), Science, Religion, and Metaphysics: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga, Oxford University Press. pp. 9-30. 2011.Commonsensism takes commonsense starting points seriously in responding to and rejecting radical skepticism. Skeptical theism endorses a sort of skepticism that, according to some, has radical skeptical implications. This suggests that there is a tension between commonsensism and skeptical theism that makes it difficult for a person rationally to hold both. In this paper I explain why there is no tension between those two positions. This explanation is then used to respond to several recent…Read more
-
Externalist Versions of EvidentialismIn McCain Kevin (ed.), Believing in Accordance with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism, Springer Verlag. 2018.Evidentialism is typically viewed as a version of internalism. In this paper, I will argue that this is a mistake: even views exhibiting fairly extreme forms of externalism can be evidentialist views. After saying what evidentialism is and identifying four grades of externalism, I will argue that, for each of these grades of externalism (from the least external first grade to the most external fourth grade), there is a version of evidentialism exhibiting that grade of externalism. I will con…Read more
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Religion |
Metaphysics |
Areas of Interest
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Religion |
Metaphysics |
Moral Epistemology |