• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Galen Strawson

University of Texas at Austin
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    153
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    23
  •  News and Updates
    50

 More details
  • University of Texas at Austin
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
University of Oxford
Faculty of Philosophy
DPhil, 1983
APA Central Division
CV
Austin, Texas, United States of America
0000-0003-0899-5906
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Consciousness
The Self
Perception
Metaphysics
Moral Psychology
Hume: Metaphysics and Epistemology
Locke: Identity
Free Will
Narrative Identity
5 more
Areas of Interest
Immanuel Kant
  • All publications (153)
  •  802
    Real materialism
    In Louise M. Antony & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics, Wiley-blackwell. 2008.
    (1) Materialists hold that every real, concrete phenomenon in the universe is a wholly physical phenomenon. (2) Consciousness ('what-it's-likeness', etc.) is the most certainly existing real, concrete phenomenon there is. It follows that (3) all serious materialists must grant that consciousness is a wholly physical phenomenon. ‘How can consciousness possibly be physical, given what we know about the physical?’ To ask this question is already to have gone wrong. We have no good reason (as Prie…Read more
    (1) Materialists hold that every real, concrete phenomenon in the universe is a wholly physical phenomenon. (2) Consciousness ('what-it's-likeness', etc.) is the most certainly existing real, concrete phenomenon there is. It follows that (3) all serious materialists must grant that consciousness is a wholly physical phenomenon. ‘How can consciousness possibly be physical, given what we know about the physical?’ To ask this question is already to have gone wrong. We have no good reason (as Priestley, Eddington, Russell and others observe) to think that we know anything about the physical that gives us any reason to find any problem in the idea that consciousness is wholly physical.
    Russellian MonismConsciousness and MaterialismFormulating PhysicalismMind-Brain Identity TheoryPhilo…Read more
    Russellian MonismConsciousness and MaterialismFormulating PhysicalismMind-Brain Identity TheoryPhilosophy, MiscQualia and Materialism
  •  217
    We Live Beyond Any Tale That We Happen to Enact
    The Harvard Review of Philosophy 18 (1): 73-90. 2012.
    PersonalityAuthenticityMoral Character, MiscIntegrity
  •  1217
    On the inevitability of freedom (from the compatibilist point of view)
    American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (4): 393-400. 1986.
    This paper argues that ability to do otherwise (in the compatibilist sense) at the moment of initiation of action is a necessary condition of being able to act at all. If the argument is correct, it shows that Harry Frankfurt never provided a genuine counterexample to the 'principles of alternative possibilities' in his 1969 paper ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’. The paper was written without knowledge of Frankfurt's paper.
    CompatibilismIncompatibilismFree Will and ResponsibilityAlternative Possibilities
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback