• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Mark Glouberman

Kwantlen Polytechnic University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    137
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    119

 More details
  • Kwantlen Polytechnic University
    Department of Philosophy
    Instructor
University of Oxford
Faculty of Philosophy
DPhil, 1973
CV
Areas of Interest
Metaphilosophy
Philosophy of Religion
20th Century Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Value Theory
History of Western Philosophy
Philosophical Traditions
Other Academic Areas
3 more
  • All publications (137)
  •  30
    Conclusion: On the Carmel
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 298-306. 2012.
  •  31
    12. Misbehaviourism
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 269-297. 2012.
  •  27
    10. Love Stories
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 216-242. 2012.
  •  24
    9. Becoming Political
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 193-215. 2012.
  •  23
    8. The Birth of Death
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 174-192. 2012.
  •  31
    7. Nobodies
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 151-173. 2012.
  •  20
    5. The Reformation
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 106-121. 2012.
  •  22
    3. An Ethical Compass
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 64-77. 2012.
  •  24
    1. In Defence of Perplexity
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 17-38. 2012.
  •  31
    2. Man’s Estate
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 39-63. 2012.
  •  41
    6. Contemplating the Bust of Homer
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 122-150. 2012.
  •  27
    Index
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 347-356. 2012.
  •  18
    11. Life and Times
    In The Raven, the Dove, and the Owl of Minerva: The Creation of Humankind in Athens and Jerusalem, University of Toronto Press. pp. 243-268. 2012.
  • Complete Causes
    Logique Et Analyse 24 (June): 231-244. 1981.
    Metaphysics and Epistemology
  •  76
    Kant's Transcendental Deductions
    Dialogue 29 (4): 575-. 1990.
    Kant: Metaphysics and Epistemology
  •  83
    The Practical World
    Idealistic Studies 29 (1-2): 1-31. 1999.
    'Everything,' Kant remarks, 'gravitates ultimately towards the practical.' Judging by 'everything,' Kant is fixing on some feature of reality that he regards as invariant across times, places, and people. Judging by 'ultimately,' Kant believes that the feature yields itself up only to penetrative philosophical scrutiny. The remark is, I believe, a key to 'the basic problem confronting any reader of [Kant],' his idealism.
    European Philosophy
  •  61
    Book review (review)
    Philosophia 8 (2-3): 509-515. 1978.
  •  1
    Intellectual intuition and cognitive assimilability
    Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 10 (3): 153-163. 1979.
    PhenomenologyEdmund HusserlHusserl: Philosophy of Mind
  •  61
    The King and 'I': Agency and rationality in athens and jerusalem
    Ratio 10 (1). 1997.
    Although Western culture draws substantively on Athens and Jerusalem, hostility tends to be shown towards Jerusalem from the philosophical wing. I attempt to correct the imbalance. Philosophy, I argue, arose in the Greek context because of a problem of self‐confidence. ‘Philosophical rationality’ cannot therefore be taken as normative for rationality generally. The contrast between the Jerusalemite and the Athenian views of self and of the contrasting estimates and explanations of the efficacy o…Read more
    Although Western culture draws substantively on Athens and Jerusalem, hostility tends to be shown towards Jerusalem from the philosophical wing. I attempt to correct the imbalance. Philosophy, I argue, arose in the Greek context because of a problem of self‐confidence. ‘Philosophical rationality’ cannot therefore be taken as normative for rationality generally. The contrast between the Jerusalemite and the Athenian views of self and of the contrasting estimates and explanations of the efficacy of the self’s agency is developed through an examination of the main documents of pre‐classical and classical Greece, and the Bible
    Rationality
  •  78
    Freedom and resentment and other essays
    Philosophia 6 (2): 321-332. 1976.
    EthicsP. F. Strawson
  •  74
    Theory and form in Descartes 'Meditations'
    Man and World 26 (3): 261-274. 1993.
    Continental PhilosophyEdmund Husserl
  •  84
    Book reviews (review)
    with Kenneth S. Friedman, Donald Gotterbarn, Bryan G. Norton, David S. Schwarz, and Walter P. Van Stigt
    Philosophia 9 (1): 805-813. 1979.
  •  90
    Interpreting bradley: the critique of fact-pluralism
    History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2): 205-223. 1988.
    The typically dismissive treatment of Bradleian idealism, to the extent that it is based on philosophical criticism rather than historical bias, suffers from a failure to distinguish Bradley's negative views from his positive doctrines. But the intermingling of the two plays havoc in Bradley's own presentation, so that proper interpretation requires a particularly aggressive approach to the texts. Specifically, in denying a real multiplicity of facts, Bradley, though he may seem to be, is not at…Read more
    The typically dismissive treatment of Bradleian idealism, to the extent that it is based on philosophical criticism rather than historical bias, suffers from a failure to distinguish Bradley's negative views from his positive doctrines. But the intermingling of the two plays havoc in Bradley's own presentation, so that proper interpretation requires a particularly aggressive approach to the texts. Specifically, in denying a real multiplicity of facts, Bradley, though he may seem to be, is not attacking the commonsense belief that there are many and disparate facts. His claim, as is confirmed by an examination of the analysis of judgement in The principles of logic, is that the facts ordinarily recognized are not those of the bona fide fact-pluralist, e.g. Mill. By getting Bradley's position straight, it becomes possible to tell an illuminating story about the early formation of ?analytic? philosophy, with its often bewildering faith in the ontological significance of logic
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicFrancis Herbert Bradley
  •  1
    Dummett on Aristotle's 'in' and Frege's 'of'
    Logique Et Analyse 20 (77-78): 159-164. 1977.
    Frege: MiscellaneousMichael Dummett
  •  57
    Progress and regress in philosophy
    Philosophia 5 (4): 529-540. 1975.
    Epistemic Regress
  •  20
    The Structure of Cartesian Scepticism
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (3): 343-357. 2010.
  •  45
    Cartesian Probability and Cognitive Structure
    Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 36 (4). 1982.
    Applications of Probability
  •  38
    Matter and Rationality
    Apeiron 11 (1). 1977.
    Classical Greek Philosophy
  •  55
    Conceptuality: An Essay in Retrieval
    Kant Studien 70 (1-4): 383-408. 1979.
    Kant: Metaphysics and Epistemology, MiscKant: Concepts
  •  135
    Kant’s ‘Critical’ Rationalism: The Dialectical Dimension
    Idealistic Studies 22 (2): 107-121. 1992.
    Matter, in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, plays a prototypical version of a rôle that recurs, refracted through the domestic preoccupations of each age, in metaphysical analyses of the constitution of the real. After identifying the rôle, I shall trace a developmental arc of philosophical treatment from Aristotle through the Cartesian period to Kant. The mature Kantian view of the rôle—the ‘critical’ view—is, I maintain, a reversion to the Aristotelian position. It is not however a simple reversion. I…Read more
    Matter, in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, plays a prototypical version of a rôle that recurs, refracted through the domestic preoccupations of each age, in metaphysical analyses of the constitution of the real. After identifying the rôle, I shall trace a developmental arc of philosophical treatment from Aristotle through the Cartesian period to Kant. The mature Kantian view of the rôle—the ‘critical’ view—is, I maintain, a reversion to the Aristotelian position. It is not however a simple reversion. It is reversion mediated through the Cartesian view. Arguably, the mediation is more than merely historical. Arguably, the Kantian treatment is conceptually or theoretically indebted to the Cartesian. This ‘dialectical’ indebtedness, if it can be established, has important, and as I see them negative, implications for the integrity of the Kantian stand.
    Kant: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback