-
4894What good are our intuitions: Philosophical analysis and social kindsAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1): 89-118. 2006.Across the humanities and social sciences it has become commonplace for scholars to argue that categories once assumed to be “natural” are in fact “social” or, in the familiar lingo, “socially constructed”. Two common examples of such categories are race and gender, but there many others. One interpretation of this claim is that although it is typically thought that what unifies the instances of such categories is some set of natural or physical properties, instead their unity rests on social fe…Read more
-
608Ideology, Generics, and Common GroundIn Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics, Springer Verlag. pp. 179--207. 2010.Are sagging pants cool? Are cows food? Are women more submissive than men? Are blacks more criminal than whites? Taking the social world at face value, many people would be tempted to answer these questions in the affirmative. And if challenged, they can point to facts that support their answers. But there is something wrong about the affirmative answers. In this chapter, I draw on recent ideas in the philosophy of language and metaphysics to show how the assertion of a generic claim of the sort…Read more
-
75Future Genders? Future Races?Philosophic Exchange 34 (1): 1-24. 2004.Gender is the social meaning of a person’s sex, and race is the social meaning of a person’s color. This paper reviews some accounts of these social meanings. It is argued that there are important differences between race and gender that count against treating them as parallel.
-
252The framing question of Mills' important and thought-provoking paper is whether there is reason for political progressives and radicals to employ the notion of a social contract for either descriptive or normative purposes. In contrast to the common response that the social contract is a piece of "bourgeois mystification" he argues instead that a reformulated conception of the contract, one which he calls the.
-
100• Ongoing concerns about time to acceptance/rejection and time to publication. o NB: Schemas kick in when people are rushed. How does this affect the refereeing process? Does it matter for desk rejections, which may be quick and based on nonanonymized papers? Does it also affect referees? How?
-
68On being objective and being objectifiedIn Louise Antony & Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One's Own, Westview Press. pp. 209--53. 2002.
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
1 more
Metaphysics |
Feminist Philosophy |
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality |
Social and Political Philosophy |
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Social Science |