-
326Aristotle’s Non-‘Dialectical’ Methodology in the Nicomachean EthicsAncient Philosophy 29 (2): 311-335. 2009.The Nicomachean Ethics is generally thought to be a “dialectical” work, aimed at resolving aporia in a set of endoxa, which it takes as its starting-point. I argue that Aristotle’s aim in the treatise is, rather, to produce definitions of key ethical terms, and that his starting-points are limited to evaluative and discriminative judgments of a certain sort, which are demanded by the nature of the discipline and are not endoxa. I discuss also how the definitions are reached (focusing on the case…Read more
-
312How We Choose Our BeliefsPhilosophia 42 (1). 2014.Recent years have seen increasing attacks on the "deontological" conception (or as we call it, the guidance conception) of epistemic justification, the view that epistemology offers advice to knowers in forming beliefs responsibly. Critics challenge an important presupposition of the guidance conception: doxastic voluntarism, the view that we choose our beliefs. We assume that epistemic guidance is indispensable, and seek to answer objections to doxastic voluntarism, most prominently William Als…Read more
-
182Αἴσθησις, Ἐμπειρία, and the Advent of Universals in Posterior Analytics II 19Apeiron 43 (2-3): 155-186. 2010.This makes three main interpretative points about the progression from perception to universals described in 'Posterior Analytics' II.19: (1) The noun "'aisthesis'" as used in the chapter may refer not to the act of perceiving but to perceptual contents retained in memory. (2) An 'empeiria' (experience) should be understood as a capacity to generate expectations about new members of an unconceptualized kind based on memories of other members of the kind. (3) The famous rout analogy is a metaphor…Read more
-
102Aristotle on Selfishness? Understanding the Iconoclasm of Nicomachean Ethics ix 8Ancient Philosophy 34 (1): 101-120. 2014.
-
195Against the standard interpretation of Aristotle as a moderate realist about universals, I argue that he knew of and rejected this position and that he held that universals do not exist independently of the mind, but have a mind-independent basis in relations of commensurability and causality between particulars and their attributes.
-
177Episteme, demonstration, and explanation: A fresh look at Aristotle’s Posterior AnalyticsMetascience 23 (1): 1-35. 2014.
-
-
University of Texas at AustinTeaching staff (Part-time)
APA Eastern Division
Austin, Texas, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Meta-Ethics |
Normative Ethics |
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy |
Areas of Interest
Epistemology |
Meta-Ethics |
Normative Ethics |
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy |