• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

John J. Davenport

Fordham University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    62
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    9

 More details
  • Fordham University
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
University of Notre Dame
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1998
Homepage
New York City, New York, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Social and Political Philosophy
Normative Ethics
19th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Religion
Social and Political Philosophy
Continental Philosophy
  • All publications (62)
  •  94
    Thomas D. D’Andrea, Tradition, Rationality, and Virtue: The Thought of Alasdair MacIntyre: Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2006, 486 pp.. ISBN: 0-7546-5112-6 UK, £65.00 US $130.00 (review)
    Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (4): 559-565. 2009.
    RationalityValue Theory, MiscellaneousPolitical TheorySemi-Compatibilism
  •  70
    Levinas's Agapeistic Metaphysics of Morals: Absolute Passivity and the Other as Eschatological Hierophany
    Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2): 331-366. 1998.
    This article evaluates Emmanuel Levinas's novel "ethical metaphysics" of interpersonal relations from a religious perspective. Levinas presents a unique version of agape ethics that can be evaluated in terms of a number of the dilemmas that have traditionally attended Christian discussions of neighbor-love. Because Levinas's analysis makes our responsibility for other persons depend on their eschatological significance, it has the same problems that hamper all theories of neighbor-love that lack…Read more
    This article evaluates Emmanuel Levinas's novel "ethical metaphysics" of interpersonal relations from a religious perspective. Levinas presents a unique version of agape ethics that can be evaluated in terms of a number of the dilemmas that have traditionally attended Christian discussions of neighbor-love. Because Levinas's analysis makes our responsibility for other persons depend on their eschatological significance, it has the same problems that hamper all theories of neighbor-love that lack a sufficient role for reciprocity.
    Religious Ethics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback