• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Leon Horsten

Universität Konstanz
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    97
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    23
  •  News and Updates
    91

 More details
  • Universität Konstanz
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
Catholic University of Louvain
Institut supérieur de philosophie
PhD, 1993
Areas of Interest
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Mathematics
  • All publications (97)
  •  92
    Dennis E. Hesseling. Gnomes in the fog: The reception of Brouwer's intuitionism in the 1920s. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhäu-ser verlag, 2003. Pp. XXIII + 448. ISBN 3-7643-6536- (review)
    Philosophia Mathematica 13 (1): 111-113. 2005.
    Philosophy of Mathematics, MiscIntuitionism and Constructivism
  •  231
    Revision Revisited
    with Graham E. Leigh, Hannes Leitgeb, and Philip Welch
    Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (4): 642-664. 2012.
    This article explores ways in which the Revision Theory of Truth can be expressed in the object language. In particular, we investigate the extent to which semantic deficiency, stable truth, and nearly stable truth can be so expressed, and we study different axiomatic systems for the Revision Theory of Truth.
    Liar ParadoxRevision Theory of Truth
  •  72
    An Axiomatic Investigation of Provability as a Primitive Predicate
    In Volker Halbach & Leon Horsten (eds.), Principles of truth, Hänsel-hohenhausen. pp. 203-220. 2002.
    Areas of Mathematics
  • Peelen, G.J. , Het voordeel van de twijfel. In gesprek met de wetenschap (review)
    Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 53 (4): 737. 1991.
  •  273
    Non-Archimedean Probability
    with Vieri Benci and Sylvia Wenmackers
    Milan Journal of Mathematics 81 (1): 121-151. 2013.
    We propose an alternative approach to probability theory closely related to the framework of numerosity theory: non-Archimedean probability (NAP). In our approach, unlike in classical probability theory, all subsets of an infinite sample space are measurable and only the empty set gets assigned probability zero (in other words: the probability functions are regular). We use a non-Archimedean field as the range of the probability function. As a result, the property of countable additivity in Kolm…Read more
    We propose an alternative approach to probability theory closely related to the framework of numerosity theory: non-Archimedean probability (NAP). In our approach, unlike in classical probability theory, all subsets of an infinite sample space are measurable and only the empty set gets assigned probability zero (in other words: the probability functions are regular). We use a non-Archimedean field as the range of the probability function. As a result, the property of countable additivity in Kolmogorov’s axiomatization of probability is replaced by a different type of infinite additivity.
    Infinitesimals and ProbabilityAxioms of ProbabilityMathematics
  • Norms for Theories of Reflexive Truth
    with Volker Halbach
    In T. Achourioti, H. Galinon, J. Martínez Fernández & K. Fujimoto (eds.), Unifying the Philosophy of Truth, Imprint: Springer. 2015.
    Truth
  •  2329
    Fair infinite lotteries
    with Sylvia Wenmackers
    Synthese 190 (1): 37-61. 2013.
    This article discusses how the concept of a fair finite lottery can best be extended to denumerably infinite lotteries. Techniques and ideas from non-standard analysis are brought to bear on the problem.
    Probabilistic Puzzles, MiscInfinitesimals and ProbabilityNonstandard Axiomatizations
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback