Cornell University
Sage School of Philosophy
PhD, 1967
Seattle, Washington, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
  •  262
    Kooky objects revisited: Aristotle's ontology
    Metaphilosophy 39 (1). 2008.
    This is an investigation of Aristotle's conception of accidental compounds (or "kooky objects," as Gareth Matthews has called them)—entities such as the pale man and the musical man. I begin with Matthews's pioneering work into kooky objects, and argue that they are not so far removed from our ordinary thinking as is commonly supposed. I go on to assess their utility in solving some familiar puzzles involving substitutivity in epistemic contexts, and compare the kooky object approach to more mod…Read more
  •  4
    Accidental Beings in Aristotle's Ontology
    In David Keyt, Georgios Anagnostopoulos & Fred D. Miller (eds.), Reason and analysis in ancient Greek philosophy: essays in honor of David Keyt, Springer. pp. 231-242. 2013.
    This is an examination of Aristotle's notion of an "accidental being" -- something intermediate between a substance and a property. An accidental being (sometimes called "accidental compound" or "kooky object") is an ephemeral object, typically the compound of a substance and a property, that exists for only as long as its components are united. I set out the role that accidental beings play in Aristotle's solutions to several philosophical problems. I also investigate the similarity between the…Read more
  •  270
    The One and the Many
    with Gareth B. Matthews
    Review of Metaphysics 21 (4): 630-655. 1968.
    We discuss Aristotle's "Categories" as an answer to Plato's One-over-Many argument. For Plato, F-ness is something "over against" particular F things; to predicate "F" of these things is to assert that they all stand in a certain relation to F-ness. Aristotle answers that predication is classification; and there being a classification of a certain sort is a fact correlative with there being things classifiable in the way the classification in question would classify them.
  •  337
    Essentialism in Aristotle
    Review of Metaphysics 31 (3): 387-405. 1978.
    Quine, in an influential passage, characterizes a certain kind of metaphysical view as "Aristotelian essentialism." Recent work on Aristotle suggests that he may not have been an essentialist in Quine's sense. This paper examines the question whether, and to what extent, Aristotle is committed to the kind of essentialism Quine discusses. Various promising areas of Aristotle's thought (alteration vs. coming-to-be and passing-away, kath' hauto predication) are examined and found wanting as sources…Read more