• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Graham Oppy

Monash University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    253
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    12
  •  News and Updates
    108
  •  Philosophical Views

 More details
  • Monash University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Princeton University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1990
Email (login required)
Homepage
0000-0003-0453-2250
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Religion
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Language
  • All publications (253)
  •  772
    O'Connor's Cosmological Argument
    In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.
    This paper criticises the cosmological argument that Tim O'Connor provides in his book *Theism and Ultimate Explanation*.
    Fine-Tuning in CosmologyIntelligent DesignArguments for Theism, MiscDivine Attributes, MiscCosmologi…Read more
    Fine-Tuning in CosmologyIntelligent DesignArguments for Theism, MiscDivine Attributes, MiscCosmological Arguments from Contingency
  •  994
    Review of *God and Design* (edited by Neil Manson) (review)
    Sophia 43 (1): 127-131. 2004.
    This is a review of Neil Manson (ed.) *God and Design*. The collected essays cover a wide spectrum of opinion, and will be required reading for anyone interested in contemporary debate on arguments for design.
    Arguments for Theism, MiscDesign Arguments for Theism, Misc
  •  117
    Theism and Atheism: Opposing Viewpoints in Philosophy (edited book)
    with Joseph W. Koterski
    Gale. 2019.
    This book is a discussion of a wide range of topics that bear on the existence of God. For each topic, there is a chapter by one (or more) theists, and a chapter by one (or more) atheists. Topics: (1) Definition; (2) Method; (3) Logic; (4) Doxastic Foundations; (5) Religious Experience; (6) Faith and Revelation; (7) Miracles; (8) Religious Diversity; (9) Causation and Sufficient Reason; (10) A Priori; (11) Our Universe; (12) Human History; (13) Human Beings; (14) Ethics; (15) Meaning; (16) Evil …Read more
    This book is a discussion of a wide range of topics that bear on the existence of God. For each topic, there is a chapter by one (or more) theists, and a chapter by one (or more) atheists. Topics: (1) Definition; (2) Method; (3) Logic; (4) Doxastic Foundations; (5) Religious Experience; (6) Faith and Revelation; (7) Miracles; (8) Religious Diversity; (9) Causation and Sufficient Reason; (10) A Priori; (11) Our Universe; (12) Human History; (13) Human Beings; (14) Ethics; (15) Meaning; (16) Evil and Suffering; (17) Science; (18) Theories of Religion; (19) Prudential / Pragmatic Arguments; (20) Final Reckonings.
    Arguments from Naturalism against TheismAtheism
  •  891
    Knowledge, Belief and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology Edited by Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne and Dani Rabinowitz (review)
    Analysis 79 (2): 381-384. 2019.
    This is a review of *Knowledge, Belief and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology* (edited by Matthew Benton, John Hawthorne, and Dani Rabinowitz). The review briefly discusses the contributed essays by Benton and Isaac Choi.
    Philosophy of Religion, MiscEpistemology of Religion, MiscChristianity, Misc
  •  2862
    The Tristram Shandy Paradox
    Philosophia Christi 4 (2): 335-349. 2002.
    This paper is a response to David Oderberg's discussion of the Tristram Shandy paradox. I defend the claim that the Tristram Shandy paradox does not support the claim that it is impossible that the past is infinite.
    Philosophy of ReligionKalam Cosmological ArgumentPhilosophy of Time, Misc
  •  1433
    Evidential Arguments from Evil and Skeptical Theism
    with Michael Almeida
    Philo 8 (2): 84-94. 2004.
    In this paper we respond to criticisms by Michael Bergmann and Michael Rea in their “In Defense of Sceptical Theism : A Reply to Almeida and Oppy,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83.
    Metaphysics and EpistemologyReligious Skepticism
  •  50
    History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand (edited book)
    with Nick Trakakis
    Springer. 2014.
    This two volume works provides a comprehensive history of philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Volume one provides a chronological history, with one chapter devoted to the early years in which idealism dominated Australasian philosophy, and then chapters that cover each of the decades from the second world war. Volume two provides a thematic history, with treatment of most of the major areas to which Australasian philosophers have made significant contributions.
    History of Western Philosophy, Misc20th Century Philosophy19th Century Philosophy
  •  735
    Wagering on an Ironic God: Pascal on Faith and Philosophy by Thomas S. Hibbs (review)
    Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2): 372-373. 2018.
    This is a short review of Thomas S. Hibbs' book: *Wagering on an Ironic God: Pascal on Faith and Philosophy*.
    Philosophy of Religion, General WorksPragmatic Arguments for Theism, MiscPascal's WagerPhilosophy of…Read more
    Philosophy of Religion, General WorksPragmatic Arguments for Theism, MiscPascal's WagerPhilosophy of Religion, Misc
  •  1050
    Review of Yujin Nagasawa, Maximal God: A New Defence of Perfect Being Theism: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, hb, ISBN: 978-0198758686, xiii+225 pp (review)
    Sophia 57 (1): 189-191. 2018.
    Ontological Arguments for Theism, MiscDivine Attributes, MiscAnselm's Ontological Argument
  •  34
    Early Modern Philosophy of Religion: The History of Western Philosophy of Religion Volume 3
    with N. Trakakis, Graham Oppy, and N. N. Trakakis
    Acumen Publishing. 2013.
    The History of Western Philosophy of Religion brings together an international team of over 100 leading scholars to provide authoritative exposition of how history's most important philosophical thinkers - from antiquity to the present day - have sought to analyse the concepts and tenets central to Western religious belief, especially Christianity. Divided chronologically into five volumes, The History of Western Philosophy of Religion is designed to be accessible to a wide range of readers, fro…Read more
    The History of Western Philosophy of Religion brings together an international team of over 100 leading scholars to provide authoritative exposition of how history's most important philosophical thinkers - from antiquity to the present day - have sought to analyse the concepts and tenets central to Western religious belief, especially Christianity. Divided chronologically into five volumes, The History of Western Philosophy of Religion is designed to be accessible to a wide range of readers, from the scholar looking for original insight and the latest research findings to the student wishing for a masterly encapsulation of a particular philosopher's views. Together these volumes provide an indispensable resource for anyone conducting research or teaching in the philosophy of religion and related fields, such as theology, religious studies, the history of philosophy, and the history of ideas. Volume 3 covers the early modern period which witnessed a revolution in science and natural philosophy that swept away two millennia of Aristotelian certainty in a human-centred universe. Covering some of the most important figures in the history of Western thought - notably Descartes, Locke, Hume and Kant - Early Modern Philosophy of Religion charts the philosophical understanding of religion at a time of intellectual and spiritual revolution.
    Philosophy of Religion, MiscPhilosophy of Religion, General WorksChristianityMedieval and Renaissanc…Read more
    Philosophy of Religion, MiscPhilosophy of Religion, General WorksChristianityMedieval and Renaissance PhilosophyCambridge PlatonismHume: Philosophy of ReligionHume and Other Philosophers
  •  981
    On Functional Definitions Of Art: A Response to Rowe
    British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (1): 67-71. 1993.
    This paper is a critical assessment of M. W. Rowe's functional definition of art.
    Philosophy of EducationThe Definition of ArtArt and Artworks, Misc
  •  634
    The Semantics of Media
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4): 582-583. 2001.
    Book Information The Semantics of Media. By Jeff Ross. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 1997. Pp. vii + 137. £56.75.
    Intensionality and OpacityCompositionalityPossible World SemanticsScopeLogical FormSpecific Expressi…Read more
    Intensionality and OpacityCompositionalityPossible World SemanticsScopeLogical FormSpecific Expressions, Misc
  •  153
    A companion to philosophy in Australia & New Zealand (edited book)
    with Nick Trakakis, Lynda Burns, Steven Gardner, and Fiona Leigh
    Monash University Publishing. 2010.
    This work is a companion to philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. It contains over two hundred entries on: Australasian philosophy departments; notable Australasian philosophers; significant events in the history of Australasian philosophy; and areas to which Australasian philosophers have made notable contributions.
    History of Western Philosophy, Misc20th Century Philosophy, MiscPhilosophy, General WorksPhilosophy,…Read more
    History of Western Philosophy, Misc20th Century Philosophy, MiscPhilosophy, General WorksPhilosophy, MiscellaneousAustralasian Philosophy, MiscPolynesian PhilosophyLegal EthicsDualism, MiscEpiphenomenalismPhysicalism about the Mind, Misc
  •  230
    The Best Argument Against God
    Palgrave-Macmillan. 2013.
    Preface -- Introduction -- Preliminary matters -- Some big ideas -- Minimal theism and naturalism -- Standard theism and naturalism -- Conclusion.
    NaturalismPhilosophy of Religion, MiscAtheismPhilosophy of Religion, General WorksArguments from Nat…Read more
    NaturalismPhilosophy of Religion, MiscAtheismPhilosophy of Religion, General WorksArguments from Naturalism against TheismAtheism and Agnosticism, Misc
  •  75
    The Antipodean philosopher (edited book)
    with Nick Trakakis
    Lexington Books. 2011.
    v. 1. Public lectures on philosophy in Australia and New Zealand -- 2. Interviews with Australian and New Zealand philosophers
    Australasian Philosophy, Misc
  •  1460
    Physicalism
    Pli 12 14-32. 2001.
    This paper is a discussion of the analysis of physicalism.
    Physicalism, MiscFormulating Physicalism
  •  1590
    Critical notice of J.P. Moreland's Consciousness and the Existence of God: A Theistic Argument
    European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1): 193-212. 2011.
    This paper is a detailed examination of some parts of J. P. Moreland's book on "the argument from consciousness". (There is a companion article that discusses the parts of the book not taken up in this critical notice.).
    Philosophy of Religion, MiscArguments for Theism, MiscScience and Religion
  •  776
    Review 'The Rationality of Theism', ed. by P. Copan and P. Moser (review)
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3): 535-8. 2004.
    Critical review of *The Rationality of Theism*, a collection of new essays edited by Paul Copan and Paul Moser.
    RationalityEpistemology of Religion, Misc
  •  966
    Late-Twentieth-Century atheism
    with Nick Trakakis
    In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Religion: The History of Western Philosophy of Religion, Volume 5, Routledge. pp. 301-12. 2009.
    This chapter provides a brief account of atheistic philosophy of relgion in the second half of the twentieth century.
    Philosophy of Religion, General WorksPhilosophy of Religion, Misc
  •  867
    On Davies' institutional definition of art
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (3): 371-382. 1991.
    This paper is a critique of Stephen Davies' institutional definition of art. I argue that Davies' definition suffers from a range of problems.
    Art and Artworks, MiscThe Definition of Art
  •  779
    Analysis of Existing: Barry Miller's Approach to God, by Elmar J. Kremer: New York: Bloomsbury, 2014, pp. xiv + 143, AU$148 (review)
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2): 409-410. 2015.
    Review of Kremer's book on Barry Miller's approach to God. (I have discussed Miller's argument from contingency in other publications.)
    Philosophy of Religion, MiscCosmological Arguments from ContingencyPhilosophy of Religion, General W…Read more
    Philosophy of Religion, MiscCosmological Arguments from ContingencyPhilosophy of Religion, General Works
  •  230
    Reading Philosophy of Religion (edited book)
    with Michael Scott
    Wiley-Blackwell. 2010.
    _Reading Philosophy of Religion_ combines a diverse selection of classical and contemporary texts in philosophy of religion with insightful commentaries. Offers a unique presentation through a combination of text and interactive commentary Provides a mix of classic and contemporary texts, including some not anthologized elsewhere Includes writings from thinkers such as Aquinas, Boethius, Hume, Plantinga and Putnam Divided into sections which examine religious language, the existence of God, reas…Read more
    _Reading Philosophy of Religion_ combines a diverse selection of classical and contemporary texts in philosophy of religion with insightful commentaries. Offers a unique presentation through a combination of text and interactive commentary Provides a mix of classic and contemporary texts, including some not anthologized elsewhere Includes writings from thinkers such as Aquinas, Boethius, Hume, Plantinga and Putnam Divided into sections which examine religious language, the existence of God, reason, argument and belief, divine properties, and religious pluralism.
    Philosophy of Religion, General WorksPhilosophy of Religion, Misc
  •  621
    "Humean" Supervenience?
    Philosophical Studies 101 (1): 77-105. 2000.
    As with many aspects of David Lewis’s work, it is hard to provide a better summary of his views than he provided himself. So the following introduction to what the Humean Supervenience view is will follow the opening pages of Lewis (1994a) extremely closely. But for those readers who haven’t read that paper, here’s the nickel version.
    Humean SupervenienceSupervenience
  •  1177
    Omnipotence
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1). 2005.
    Recently, many philosophers have supposed that the divine attribute of omnipotence is properly understood as some kind of maximal power. I argue that all of the best known attempts to analyse omnipotence in terms of maximal power are multiply flawed. Moreover, I argue that there are compelling reasons for supposing that, on orthodox theistic conceptions, maximal power is not one of the divine attributes.
    Divine Omnipotence
  •  2074
    Arguing About The Kalam Cosmological Argument
    Philo 5 (1): 34-61. 2002.
    This paper begins with a fairly careful and detailed discussion of the conditions under which someone who presents an argument ought to be prepared to concede that the argument is unsuccessful. The conclusions reached in this discussion are then applied to William Lane Craig’s defense of what he calls “the kalam cosmological argument.” Perhaps unsurprisingly, the chief contention of the paper is that Craig ought to be prepared to concede that “the kalam cosmological argument” is not a successful…Read more
    This paper begins with a fairly careful and detailed discussion of the conditions under which someone who presents an argument ought to be prepared to concede that the argument is unsuccessful. The conclusions reached in this discussion are then applied to William Lane Craig’s defense of what he calls “the kalam cosmological argument.” Perhaps unsurprisingly, the chief contention of the paper is that Craig ought to be prepared to concede that “the kalam cosmological argument” is not a successful argument. The paper pays particular attention to Craig’s recent criticisms of Adolf Grünbaum’s contention that “the kalam cosmological argument” presupposes “the normalcy of nothingness”; and it also addresses some methodological issues raised by Craig’s response to my previous criticisms of his replies to critiques of “the kalam cosmological argument” provided by Grünbaum, Hawking, and Davies.
    Kalam Cosmological Argument
  •  596
    Review of D. Jacquette, Meinongian logic (review)
    Mind 107 (428): 877-908. 1998.
    This is a review of *Meinongian Logic* (by Dale Jacquette).
    Alexius MeinongLogic and Philosophy of LogicPhilosophy of Language
  •  2581
    From the Tristram Shandy Paradox to the Christmas Shandy Paradox: Reply to Oderberg
    Ars Disputandi 3 172-195. 2003.
    This paper is a response to David Oderberg's criticisms of a previous paper of mine. (Bibliographical details are provided in the article.)
    Kalam Cosmological ArgumentPhilosophy of Religion, Misc
  •  1279
    Weak agnosticism defended
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (3). 1994.
    Agnosticism has had some bad press in recent years. Nonetheless, I hope to show that agnosticism can be so formulated that it is no less philosophically respectable than theism and atheism. This is not a mere philosophical exercise; for, as it happens, the formulated position is--I think--the one to which I subscribe. I include a qualification here since it may be that the position to which I subscribe is better characterised as fallibilist atheism--but more of that anon
    Agnosticism
  •  764
    Williams on Kaplan on the contingent analytic
    Ratio 8 (2): 189-192. 1995.
    This paper is a reply to a prior work by C. J. F. Williams in which he criticised David Kaplan's account of the contingent analytic. In this paper, I take myself to be defending Kaplan's views against Williams' attack.
    Metaphysical NecessityMetaphysics, MiscRigid DesignationMillian Theories of Names
  •  6879
    Rowe's evidential arguments from evil
    In Justin P. Mcbrayer (ed.), A Companion to the Problem of Evil, Wiley. pp. 49-66. 2013.
    This chapter discusses the two most prominent recent evidential arguments from evil, due, respectively, to William Rowe and Paul Draper. I argue that neither of these evidential arguments from evil is successful, i.e. such that it ought to persuade anyone who believes in God to give up that belief. In my view, theists can rationally maintain that each of these evidential arguments from evil contains at least one false premise.
    The Argument from EvilAtheismReligious SkepticismDivine OmniscienceDivine GoodnessDivine Omnipotence
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback