-
53Beyond interpretation: Reply to Cummins' response (review)Minds and Machines 2 (1): 85-95. 1992.In his response to my Why There Are No Mental Representations, Robert Cummins accused me of having misinterpreted his views, and attempted to undermine a crucial premise of my argument, which claimed that one could only define a semantic type non-semantically by stipulating which tokens should receive a uniform interpretation. I respond to the charge and defend the premise
Areas of Interest
1 more
Epistemology |
Metaphysics |
Philosophy of Language |
Philosophy of Mind |
Aesthetics |
20th Century Philosophy |