-
34Transworld Depravity and Unobtainable WorldsPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1): 165-177. 2009.
-
29Anselm's Discovery: A Re-Examination of the OntoLogical Proof for God's ExistencePhilosophical Review 78 (3): 405. 1969.
-
28De EssentiaGrazer Philosophische Studien 7 (1): 101-121. 1979.In this paper I propose an amendment to Chisholm's definition of individual essence. I then argue that a thing has more than one individual essence and that there is no reason to believe no one grasps anyone else's essence. The remainder of the paper is devoted to a refutation of existentialism, the view that the essence of an object X (along with propositions and states of affairs directly about x) is ontologically dependent upon x in the sense that it could not have existed if x had not existe…Read more
-
28Response to WarrantWarrant: The Current Debate.Warrant and Proper FunctionPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2): 415. 1995.
-
24Functionalism and MaterialismPhilosophia Christi 14 (1): 49-54. 2012.My major dispute with Michael Tooley’s response (“Plantinga’s New Argument against Materialism”) to my original article is with his philosophy of mind. Tooley’s objection depends on a functionalist account of mental states such as beliefs, desires and intentions. I offer reasons to reject functionalism and, hence, the same goes for any objection to my argument that is based on or presupposes functionalism.
-
24Resurrecting Old-Fashioned FoundationalismRowman & Littlefield Publishers. 2000.The contributions in this volume make an important effort to resurrect a rather old fashioned form of foundationalism. They defend the position that there are some beliefs that are justified, and are not themselves justified by any further beliefs. This epistemic foundationalism has been the subject of rigorous attack by a wide range of theorists in recent years, leading to the impression that foundationalism is a thing of the past. DePaul argues that it is precisely the volume and virulence of …Read more
-
24The Perfect Goodness of GodAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (n/a): 70. 1962.The author criticizes an article by c b martin called "the perfect good." the author shows that martin's argument, That the theologians' argument is a contradiction, Does not hold. (staff)
-
22Proper FunctionalismWarrant: The Current Debate.Warrant and Proper FunctionNoûs 27 (1): 34. 1993.
-
22``Pluralism: A Defense of Religious Exclusivism"In Kevin Meeker & Philip Quinn (eds.), The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity, Oxford University Press. pp. 172-192. 1995.
-
20The Foundations of TheismFaith and Philosophy 3 (3): 298-313. 1986.Philip Quinn’s “On Finding the Foundations of Theism” is both challenging and important. Quinn proposes at least the following four theses: (a) my argument against the criteria of proper basicality proposed by classical foundationalism is unsuccessful, (b) the quasi-inductive method I suggest for arriving at criteria of proper basicality is defective, (c) even if belief in God is properly basic, it could without loss of justification be accepted on the basis of other propositions, and (d) belief…Read more
-
20Religious experience and religious belief: essays in the epistemology of religion (edited book)University Press of America. 1986.To find more information on Rowman & Littlefield titles, please visit us at www.rowmanlittlefield.com.
-
20Gewährleisteter Christlicher GlaubeDe Gruyter. 2015.Gewahrleisteter Christliche Glaube is the German translation of Alvin Plantinga s seminal work, Warranted Christian Belief. Plantinga was among the most influential religious philosophers of the 20th century. His notion of warrant is difficult to translate, referring to the quality that distinguishes a true belief from knowledge. Plantinga s core thesis is that religious beliefs can be warranted."
-
20What’s The Question?Journal of Philosophical Research 20 19-43. 1995.Two kinds of critical questions have been asked about the propriety or rightness of Christian beliefs. The first is the de facto question: is Christian belief true? The second is the de jure question: is it rational, or reasonable, or intellectually acceptable, or rationally justifiable? This second question is much harder to locate than you’d guess from looking at the literature. In “Perceiving God” William AIston suggests that the (or a) right question here is the question of “the practical ra…Read more
-
18Reformed EpistemologyIn Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, Wiley‐blackwell. 2010.This chapter contains sections titled: Works cited Additional recommendations by editors.
-
17Tanrı ve Diğer ZihinlerFol Yayınları. 2024.“1950’li yıllarda dönemin büyük felsefecileri arasında dinsel inancı savunan bir kişi bile yoktu. 1990’lı yıllarda Yale’den UCLA’ya, Oxford’dan Heidelberg’e kadar birçok yerde insanın manevi yanını savunan ve geliştiren yüzlerce kitap yazılacak, sel olup akacaktı. Aradaki 40 yıllık süre zarfındaysa sadece ve sadece Alvin Plantinga vardı.” Kelly James Clark Tanrı’nın veya tanrıların varlığı sorusu felsefenin ezeli sorularından biri olagelmişse de Nietzsche’nin Tanrı’nın ölümünü ilan ettiği günden…Read more
-
17Things and Persons,Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics (review)Review of Metaphysics 14 (3): 493-519. 1961.Individuals is divided into two parts. In Part I, Strawson tries to show that there is an important sense in which material objects and persons are basic particulars. In Part II "the aim is to establish and explain the connexion between the idea of a particular in general and that of an object of reference or logical subject". Part II contains a wealth of interesting material and ingenious argumentation. Most important here, perhaps, is Strawson's attempt to provide criteria for distinguishing s…Read more
-
16Knowledge and Christian beliefWilliam B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 2015.Can we speak and think about God? -- What is the question? -- Warranted belief in God -- The extended A/C model -- Faith -- Sealed upon our hearts -- Objections -- Defeaters? historical biblical criticism -- Defeaters? pluralism -- Defeaters? evil.
-
16The Evolutionary Argument against NaturalismIn J. B. Stump & Alan G. Padgett (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity, Wiley. 2012.This chapter contains sections titled: Evolution and Naturalism Reliability of Our Cognitive Faculties Naturalists Are Committed to Materialism Materialist Construal of Beliefs Reductive and Non‐reductive Materialism The Argument against Non‐reductive Materialism Reductive Materialism Objection Conclusion Note References Further Reading.
-
14Chisholmian internalismIn D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 127--151. 1988.
-
14Adorno, theodor & eisler, hanns. Composing for the Films. Introduction by Graham McCann. London: Continuum Books. ISBN 9780826499028.£ 14.00 (pbk). almond, ian. The New Orientalists: Postmodern (review)British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1). 2008.
-
14Against NaturalismIn Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God, Blackwell. 2008.This chapter contains sections titled: Theism Alternatives to Theism Naturalism and Its Woes Conclusion.
-
13``On Heresy, Mind, and Truth"Faith and Philosophy 16 (2): 182-193. 1999.In this article I thank Eleonore Stump, Peter van Inwagen, and Merold Westphal for their gracious and insightful comments on my “Advice”; then I try to reply.
Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Religion |
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Religion |
17th/18th Century Philosophy |