-
2‘Is and Ought’: Yet AgainIn Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth, Springer Verlag. pp. 155-173. 2019.Hume was wrong about getting an ‘ought’ out of an ‘is’: We do it all the time. The precaution which ‘authors do not commonly use’ is a relevant principle which we insert between mere is and axiological ought. Pamela in Richardson’s Pamela had one notable principle: qv. Kant’s later insistence that we ‘Act only on that maxim that you can at the same time will be an universal law’ sinks Hume.
-
The Readymades of Marcel Duchamp: Cut Flowers or les fleurs du mal?Literature & Aesthetics 10 31-50. 2000.
-
McCloskey, M. A.: "Kant's Aesthetic" (review)Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (n/a): 467. 1990.
-
Barnett Newman: The 'Zip' and Specious Presents, or Presence. What Am I Doing Here?Literature & Aesthetics 13 (1): 71-87. 2003.