profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Manuel Dr. Knoll

LMU Munich
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    93
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    29

 More details
  • LMU Munich
    Geschwister-Scholl-Institute of Political Science
    Privatdozent
LMU Munich
GSI
PhD, 2000
CV
Homepage
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
0000-0002-0651-1915
Areas of Specialization
Ancient Greek Political Philosophy
Friedrich Nietzsche
Justice in Applied Ethics
Applied Ethics and Normative Ethics
Social and Political Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Social and Political Philosophy
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy, Miscellaneous
Ancient Greek Political Philosophy
Friedrich Nietzsche
Justice in Applied Ethics
Applied Ethics and Normative Ethics
1 more
  • All publications (93)
  • Sphären der Gerechtigkeit: Ein kooperativer Kommentar (Preface by M. Walzer) (edited book)
    with Michael Spieker
    Steiner Verlag. 2014.
    Political Theory
  •  1743
    Nietzsches Begriff der Sozialen Gerechtigkeit
    Nietzsche Studien 38 (1): 156-181. 2009.
    Up to now researchers have maintained that Nietzsche’s philosophy has no concept of social justice or have hardly noticed such a concept. On the contrary, this article argues that social justice plays an important role in Nietzsche’s political thinking. It shows that his conception of justice is modelled after Plato’s antique concept of political justice. The main thesis of the paper is that this conception is embodied in Nietzsche’s notion of a well-ordered state or society. An additional thes…Read more
    Up to now researchers have maintained that Nietzsche’s philosophy has no concept of social justice or have hardly noticed such a concept. On the contrary, this article argues that social justice plays an important role in Nietzsche’s political thinking. It shows that his conception of justice is modelled after Plato’s antique concept of political justice. The main thesis of the paper is that this conception is embodied in Nietzsche’s notion of a well-ordered state or society. An additional thesis concerns the anthropological basis of what Nietzsche holds to be a just social order. This basis is constituted by his conviction that people are not only fundamentally unequal but also extremely different in worth and rank.
    Political EthicsPolitical TheoryFriedrich Nietzsche
  •  29
    Contents
    with Barry Stocker
    In Manuel Knoll & Barry Stocker (eds.), Nietzsche as Political Philosopher, De Gruyter. 2014.
  •  33
    9. Platon: Die Theorie der Tüchtigkeit, der Glückseligkeit und der Polis
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 229-254. 2017.
  •  28
    Notes on Contributors
    with Barry Stocker
    In Manuel Knoll & Barry Stocker (eds.), Nietzsche as Political Philosopher, De Gruyter. pp. 449-454. 2014.
  •  100
    The “Übermensch” as a Social and Political Task: A Study in the Continuity of Nietzsche’s Political Thought
    In Manuel Knoll & Barry Stocker (eds.), Nietzsche as Political Philosopher, De Gruyter. pp. 239-266. 2014.
    This paper aims to show the continuity and unity of Nietzsche’s political thought. Its first thesis the claim is made that The Greek State and the third Untimely Meditation already contain essential elements of Nietzsche’s later conception of the “Übermensch”, the meaning of which is better understood by connecting it to arguments articulated in these early writings. According to the second thesis of this paper, Nietzsche conceives the generation of a higher type of man or “Übermensch” not…Read more
    This paper aims to show the continuity and unity of Nietzsche’s political thought. Its first thesis the claim is made that The Greek State and the third Untimely Meditation already contain essential elements of Nietzsche’s later conception of the “Übermensch”, the meaning of which is better understood by connecting it to arguments articulated in these early writings. According to the second thesis of this paper, Nietzsche conceives the generation of a higher type of man or “Übermensch” not primarily as the affair of an isolated individual but as a social and political task.
    Friedrich Nietzsche
  •  33
    Niccolo Machiavelli: die Geburt des Staates (edited book)
    with Stefano Saracino
    Steiner. 2010.
    English summary: How Niccolo Machiavelli is to be understood is still passionately argued today. The many facets of his political thought correspond to the diversity of perspectives among his interpreters. The authors of this interdisciplinary volume analyze Machiavelli's works in connection with transformations of thought on policy, rule and morality from the beginning of the early modern period through to the present. In addition to the interpretation of Machiavelli through the lens of his tim…Read more
    English summary: How Niccolo Machiavelli is to be understood is still passionately argued today. The many facets of his political thought correspond to the diversity of perspectives among his interpreters. The authors of this interdisciplinary volume analyze Machiavelli's works in connection with transformations of thought on policy, rule and morality from the beginning of the early modern period through to the present. In addition to the interpretation of Machiavelli through the lens of his time, effects of his writings and thought in contemporary discourse are focused upon. Topics not only include Machiavelli's relationship to the modern concept of the state and his experimental morality, but also his demonological style of reading and his presence amongst contemporary republicans and liberals, amongst thinkers such as Max Horkheimer and Michel Foucault, as well as in the empire debate. Additionally, the volume takes into account thus far little-explored aspects, such as Machiavelli's thinking style and methodology, as well as the literary-rhetorical dimension of his writings. German text. German description: Bis heute wird leidenschaftlich darueber gestritten, wie Niccolo Machiavelli verstanden werden muss. Dem Facettenreichtum seines politischen Denkens entspricht die Vielfalt der Perspektiven und Urteile seiner Interpreten. Die Autoren des interdisziplinar angelegten Bandes analysieren Machiavellis Werke im Zusammenhang mit den spiegelbildlichen Wandlungen des Denkens ueber Ordnung, Herrschaft und Moral zu Beginn der Neuzeit und in der Gegenwart. Ausser der Interpretation Machiavellis aus dem Horizont seiner Zeit stehen auch seine Wirkungen in zeitgenossischen Diskursen im Mittelpunkt. Themen sind nicht bloss Machiavellis Verhaltnis zum modernen Staatsbegriff und seine experimentelle Moral, sondern auch seine damonologische Leseweise und seine Prasenz bei zeitgenossischen Republikanern und Liberalisten, bei Denkern wie Max Horkheimer und Michel Foucault sowie in der Empire-Debatte. Zudem beruecksichtigt der Band bislang wenig erforschte Aspekte wie Machiavellis Denkstil und Methode sowie die literarisch-rhetorische Dimension seiner Schriften.
    Niccolo Machiavelli
  •  33
    Abbreviations
    with Barry Stocker
    In Manuel Knoll & Barry Stocker (eds.), Nietzsche as Political Philosopher, De Gruyter. 2014.
  •  31
    13. Serviceteil
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 343-362. 2017.
  •  91
    Aristóteles y el pensamiento político aristocrático
    Revista de Filosofía 73 87-106. 2017.
    Según una influyente línea interpretativa, la mejor polis de Aristóteles debe ser considerada una politeia. Esta corriente predomina aún hoy entre los eruditos alemanes. En tanto paladina de la “social democracia aristotélica”, Martha Nussbaum pertenece también a esta línea exegética. En oposición a tales interpretaciones, este ensayo defiende la tesis de que Aristóteles pertenece a la tradición de pensamiento político aristocrático. Esta tradición se remonta a Teognis, Heráclito y Platón y se i…Read more
    Según una influyente línea interpretativa, la mejor polis de Aristóteles debe ser considerada una politeia. Esta corriente predomina aún hoy entre los eruditos alemanes. En tanto paladina de la “social democracia aristotélica”, Martha Nussbaum pertenece también a esta línea exegética. En oposición a tales interpretaciones, este ensayo defiende la tesis de que Aristóteles pertenece a la tradición de pensamiento político aristocrático. Esta tradición se remonta a Teognis, Heráclito y Platón y se inicia como una crítica dirigida tanto a la decadencia de la virtud aristocrática cuanto al ascenso de valores democráticos e igualitarios. Este trabajo demuestra que Aristóteles concibe las diferentes formas de constitución como manifestaciones de distintas concepciones de la justicia distributiva. Aristóteles mantiene una clara preferencia por una concepción aristocrática de la justicia, y, por tanto, por la aristocracia. La constitución de la mejor polis que detalla en los libros VII y VIII de la Política debe entenderse como una “verdadera aristocracia” en la que los cargos políticos son distribuidos según el mérito entre los ciudadanos que sean los mejores desde el punto de vista moral e intelectual. Palabras clave: Aristóteles, pensamiento político aristocrático, justicia distributiva, aristocracia, mejor polis.
    Ancient Greek and Roman Political PhilosophyAristotle: Political PhilosophySocial and Political Phil…Read more
    Ancient Greek and Roman Political PhilosophyAristotle: Political PhilosophySocial and Political Philosophy, MiscellaneousAristotle: Ethics, Misc
  •  28
    6. Die jüngeren Sophisten: Gleichheit oder Ungleichheit der Menschen?
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 147-170. 2017.
  •  45
    10. Aristoteles: Die Naturphilosophie und die Metaphysik
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 255-276. 2017.
  •  52
    Author Index
    with Nurdane Şimsek and Stephen Snyder
    In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimsek (eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, De Gruyter. pp. 545-550. 2018.
  •  51
    Martha Nussbaum und Aristoteles
    Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 101 (1): 32-51. 2015.
    This paper gives a detailed analysis of Nussbaum's,,capabilities approach“ and her claim that it is a genuinely Aristotelian contemporary political philosophy. The paper comprehensively examines how Nussbaum bases her approach on human nature and questions her assertion that Aristotle's account of human nature and her approach are not metaphysical. It analyses the normative dimension of her,,capabilities approach“ and shows how she adopts and modifies Aristotle's doctrine of distributive justice…Read more
    This paper gives a detailed analysis of Nussbaum's,,capabilities approach“ and her claim that it is a genuinely Aristotelian contemporary political philosophy. The paper comprehensively examines how Nussbaum bases her approach on human nature and questions her assertion that Aristotle's account of human nature and her approach are not metaphysical. It analyses the normative dimension of her,,capabilities approach“ and shows how she adopts and modifies Aristotle's doctrine of distributive justice in an egalitarian way. With reference to contemporary literature on Aristotle's _Politics_, the paper criticizes that Nussbaum assimilates his political philosophy into modern values and notions, laying out several reasons supporting the thesis that Nussbaum's,,capabilities approach“ should not be regarded as an Aristotelian approach
    Value Theory
  •  42
    4. Die ewigen Bausteine der Dinge der Welt: Empedokles, Anaxagoras und die Atomisten
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 97-124. 2017.
  •  51
    Does Rawls’s First Principle of Justice Allow for Consensus? A Note
    with Nurdane Şimşek
    In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimsek (eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, De Gruyter. pp. 127-130. 2018.
  •  28
    2. Die milesische Kosmologie und die frühe italische Philosophie
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 37-62. 2017.
  •  72
    Antike Griechische Philosophie
    De Gruyter. 2017.
    Manuel Knoll führt in diesem Studienbuch in die griechische Philosophie sowie deren kontroverse Interpretationen ein. Die Darstellung ist dabei klar und an der neuesten Forschung orientiert. Einen Schwerpunkt bilden die antike Ethik und politische Philosophie. Ausführlich behandelt werden jedoch auch die frühgriechische Philosophie, die Sophisten und Sokrates, Platons Ideentheorie und die Metaphysik, Theologie und Naturphilosophie des Aristoteles. Das Buch präsentiert zudem die Naturphilosophie …Read more
    Manuel Knoll führt in diesem Studienbuch in die griechische Philosophie sowie deren kontroverse Interpretationen ein. Die Darstellung ist dabei klar und an der neuesten Forschung orientiert. Einen Schwerpunkt bilden die antike Ethik und politische Philosophie. Ausführlich behandelt werden jedoch auch die frühgriechische Philosophie, die Sophisten und Sokrates, Platons Ideentheorie und die Metaphysik, Theologie und Naturphilosophie des Aristoteles. Das Buch präsentiert zudem die Naturphilosophie und Ethik der Epikureer und der Stoiker. Die Serviceteile des Buchs informieren über Quellensammlungen, Nachschlagewerke und Literatur und bieten Übersetzungen zentraler Termini. Das Buch ist unerlässliche Lektüre für alle Studenten der antiken Philosophie.
    Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
  •  54
    Subject Index
    with Nurdane Şimsek and Stephen Snyder
    In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimsek (eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, De Gruyter. pp. 551-564. 2018.
  •  33
    3. Heraklit, Parmenides und die eleatische Schule
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 63-96. 2017.
  •  39
    1. Die Geburt der griechischen Philosophie: Hesiod und Thales
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 13-36. 2017.
  •  37
    14. Anhang
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 363-398. 2017.
  •  41
    Frontmatter
    with Nurdane Şimsek and Stephen Snyder
    In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimsek (eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, De Gruyter. 2018.
  •  33
    Frontmatter
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 1-4. 2017.
  •  45
    11. Aristoteles: Psychologie, Ethik und politische Philosophie
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 277-304. 2017.
  •  52
    Introduction: Two Opposing Conceptions of Distributive Justice
    with Nurdane Şimşek and Stephen Snyder
    In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimsek (eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, De Gruyter. pp. 1-20. 2018.
    The concept of distributive justice and its history are far more complex than most contemporary scholars are aware of. This introduction to the volume "New Perspectives on Distributive Justice" elucides the different meanings of the concept in the tradition of Plato and Aristotle on the one hand, and in contemporary political philosophy on the other.
    Social and Political Philosophy, MiscellaneousPolitical Ethics
  •  51
    Inhalt
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 5-8. 2017.
  •  37
    12. Die hellenistische Philosophie: Stoa, Epikur und Skepsis
    In Antike Griechische Philosophie, De Gruyter. pp. 305-342. 2017.
  •  45
    Notes on Contributors
    with Nurdane Şimsek and Stephen Snyder
    In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimsek (eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, De Gruyter. pp. 541-544. 2018.
  •  36
    Table of Contents
    with Nurdane Şimsek and Stephen Snyder
    In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimsek (eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, De Gruyter. 2018.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University