•  43
    Avoiding Anscombe's paradox
    Theory and Decision 16 (3): 233-238. 1984.
  •  85
    Peer Disagreement and Independence Preservation
    Erkenntnis 74 (2): 277-288. 2011.
    It has often been recommended that the differing probability distributions of a group of experts should be reconciled in such a way as to preserve each instance of independence common to all of their distributions. When probability pooling is subject to a universal domain condition, along with state-wise aggregation, there are severe limitations on implementing this recommendation. In particular, when the individuals are epistemic peers whose probability assessments are to be accorded equal weig…Read more
  •  23
    Peter Fishburn’s analysis of ambiguity
    with Mark Shattuck
    Theory and Decision 81 (2): 153-165. 2016.
    In ordinary discourse the term ambiguity typically refers to vagueness or imprecision in a natural language. Among decision theorists, however, this term usually refers to imprecision in an individual’s probabilistic judgments, in the sense that the available evidence is consistent with more than one probability distribution over possible states of the world. Avoiding a prior commitment to either of these interpretations, Fishburn has explored ambiguity as a primitive concept, in terms of what h…Read more