• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

John Ozolins

University of Notre Dame Australia
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    38
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates

 More details
  • University of Notre Dame Australia
    School of Philosophy and Theology, Sydney
    Professor
  • All publications (38)
  • Intelligent Design, Cosmology and Quantum Physics
    Ethics Education 11 (2). 2005.
  • Challenging the Assumptions of Capitalism
    Ethics Education 6 (1-2). 2000.
    Political Views
  • The Sovereignty of States and Asylum Seekers
    Ethics Education 10 (1). 2004.
  • Response to Drum on Suicide and Euthanasia
    Ethics Education 5 (2). 1999.
    EuthanasiaAssisted Suicide
  • Love and Harvesting a Dead Husband's Sperm
    Ethics Education 4 (4). 1998.
    Ethics
  • J.S. Mill And The Nature Of Pleasures
    Ethics Education 4 (3). 1998.
  • Alternatives to Libertarianism and the Cult of Individualism: Traditional Communitarianism
    Ethics Education 8 (1). 2002.
    Political Views
  •  91
    Suffering: Valuable or just useless pain?
    Sophia 42 (2): 53-77. 2003.
    It is a commonly held view, buttressed by utilitarian considerations, that pain and suffering are valueless and not to be borne. Moreover, it is this thought, that they are valueless, which is often deployed in arguing for euthanasia for the terminally ill or those with mental or physical disability. This essay argues that suffering is inextricably part of the human condition and that it is our response to it that determines whether we are ennobled or degraded by it. While it is not sought for i…Read more
    It is a commonly held view, buttressed by utilitarian considerations, that pain and suffering are valueless and not to be borne. Moreover, it is this thought, that they are valueless, which is often deployed in arguing for euthanasia for the terminally ill or those with mental or physical disability. This essay argues that suffering is inextricably part of the human condition and that it is our response to it that determines whether we are ennobled or degraded by it. While it is not sought for itself, suffering provides human beings with the opportunity to be ennobled, to be given unexpected experiences of love and to gain improbable sources of strength and so it can have a use which can make it valuable.
    PainDisabilityThe Argument from EvilEvil
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback