• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Jean Gayon

University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    69
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    4
  •  News and Updates
    32

 More details
  • University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
    Department for Teaching and Research in Philosophy (UFR10)
    Regular Faculty
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Biology
20th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Biology
20th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (69)
  •  74
    Philosophy and history of science in Sober: comments on Did Write the Origin Backwards?
    Philosophical Studies 172 (3): 803-811. 2015.
    Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards is Sober’s book that comes closest to history of science. Some reviews have expressed reservations about Sober’s inclination to subordinate historical accuracy to analytical clarity, and to contemporary discussions . My comments will be devoted to the kind of relationship that Sober entertains with history of science. I do not think that the author’s interest in history is superficial and instrumental.In the first section, I try to locate Sober’s book within…Read more
    Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards is Sober’s book that comes closest to history of science. Some reviews have expressed reservations about Sober’s inclination to subordinate historical accuracy to analytical clarity, and to contemporary discussions . My comments will be devoted to the kind of relationship that Sober entertains with history of science. I do not think that the author’s interest in history is superficial and instrumental.In the first section, I try to locate Sober’s book within ‘&HPS’ , a recent initiative that gathers a growing number of people willing to promote a new regime of interaction between philosophy and history of science. I will suggest that Sober offers an interesting way of developing this approach. The more critical second section is devoted to Sober’s first chapter, bearing on the relationship between the two main tenets of Darwin’s argument in the Origin—descent with modif ..
    History of Biology
  •  53
    La biologie darwinienne de l'évolution est-elle 'reductionniste'?
    Revue Philosophique De Louvain 93 (1): 111-139. 1995.
    Evolutionary Biology
  •  7
    Eugenics: an historical and philosophical schema
    Ludus Vitalis 5 (8): 81-99. 1997.
    Eugenics
  •  46
    Darwin and Darwinism in france after 1900
    DarwinismHistory of Biology
  •  9
    Genetics after World War II: The Laboratories at Gif
    with Richard Burian
    Cahiers Pour l'Histoire du CNRS 7 25-48. 1990.
    Genetics, MiscHistory of Biology
  •  38
    The Genetics of Experimental Populations: L'Héritier and Teissier's Populations Cages
    with Michel Veuille
    EthicsGenetics and Molecular Biology
  •  78
    Marjorie Grene: Personal Memories
    Biological Theory 4 (2): 188-190. 2009.
    Philosophy of Biology, Miscellaneous
  •  62
    From relative growth to allometry (1918-1936)
    Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 53 (3-4): 475-498. 2000.
  • Darwin's Struggle for Survival: Heredity and the Hypothesis of Natural Selection
    with Matthew Cobb
    Journal of the History of Biology 32 (2): 413-415. 1999.
    In Darwinism's Struggle for Survival Jean Gayon offers a philosophical interpretation of the history of theoretical Darwinism. He begins by examining the different forms taken by the hypothesis of natural selection in the nineteenth century and the major difficulties which it encountered, particularly with regard to its compatibility with the theory of heredity. He then shows how these difficulties were overcome during the seventy years which followed the publication of Darwin's Origin of Specie…Read more
    In Darwinism's Struggle for Survival Jean Gayon offers a philosophical interpretation of the history of theoretical Darwinism. He begins by examining the different forms taken by the hypothesis of natural selection in the nineteenth century and the major difficulties which it encountered, particularly with regard to its compatibility with the theory of heredity. He then shows how these difficulties were overcome during the seventy years which followed the publication of Darwin's Origin of Species, and he concludes by analysing the major features of the genetic theory of natural selection, as it developed from 1920 to 1960. This rich and wide-ranging study will appeal to philosophers and historians of science and to evolutionary biologists
    Evolutionary BiologyHistory of Biology
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback