• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Ben Blumson

National University of Singapore
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    41
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Recommended
    88
  •  Events
    15
  •  News and Updates
    52

 More details
  • National University of Singapore
    Department of Philosophy
    Associate Professor
Australian National University
School of Philosophy
PhD, 2007
Homepage
Singapore, Singapore
0000-0002-2469-3150
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Aesthetics
Areas of Interest
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
PhilPapers Editorships
Depiction
  • All publications (41)
  •  1390
    Story Size
    Philosophical Papers 44 (2): 121-137. 2015.
    The shortest stories are zero words long. There is no maximum length.
    Philosophy of Literature, MiscFiction, MiscOntology of Literature
  •  1178
    Images, intentionality and inexistence
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3): 522-538. 2009.
    The possibilities of depicting non-existents, depicting non-particulars and depictive misrepresentation are frequently cited as grounds for denying the platitude that depiction is mediated by resemblance. I first argue that these problems are really a manifestation of the more general problem of intentionality. I then show how there is a plausible solution to the general problem of intentionality which is consonant with the platitude.
    DepictionIntentional Objects
  •  765
    A Syncretistic Theory of Depiction
    British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (4): 427-429. 2016.
    Review of A Syncretistic Theory of Depiction by Alberto Voltolini.
    Depiction
  •  1757
    Distance and Dissimilarity
    Philosophical Papers 48 (2): 211-239. 2018.
    This paper considers whether an analogy between distance and dissimilarlity supports the thesis that degree of dissimilarity is distance in a metric space. A straightforward way to justify the thesis would be to define degree of dissimilarity as a function of number of properties in common and not in common. But, infamously, this approach has problems with infinity. An alternative approach would be to prove representation and uniqueness theorems, according to which if comparative dissimilarity m…Read more
    This paper considers whether an analogy between distance and dissimilarlity supports the thesis that degree of dissimilarity is distance in a metric space. A straightforward way to justify the thesis would be to define degree of dissimilarity as a function of number of properties in common and not in common. But, infamously, this approach has problems with infinity. An alternative approach would be to prove representation and uniqueness theorems, according to which if comparative dissimilarity meets certain qualitative conditions, then it is representable by distance in a metric space. I will argue that this approach faces equally severe problems with infinity.
    Measurement in ScienceNatural PropertiesProperties, Misc
  •  1199
    Pictures, perspective and possibility
    Philosophical Studies 149 (2): 135-151. 2010.
    This paper argues for a possible worlds theory of the content of pictures, with three complications: depictive content is centred, two-dimensional and structured. The paper argues that this theory supports a strong analogy between depictive and other kinds of representation and the platitude that depiction is mediated by resemblance.
    DepictionPossible World Semantics
  •  101
    Depiction and Intention
    In Resemblance and Representation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Pictures, Open Book Publishers. pp. 51-66. 2014.
    This chapter defends intentionalism about pictorial representation.
    PhotographyDepictionIntention-Based Theories of MeaningThe Interpretation of Art
  •  2206
    Two Conceptions of Similarity
    Philosophical Quarterly 68 (270): 21-37. 2018.
    There are at least two traditional conceptions of numerical degree of similarity. According to the first, the degree of dissimilarity between two particulars is their distance apart in a metric space. According to the second, the degree of similarity between two particulars is a function of the number of (sparse) properties they have in common and not in common. This paper argues that these two conceptions are logically independent, but philosophically inconsonant.
    Natural PropertiesProperties, Misc
  •  124
    Symbol Systems
    In Resemblance and Representation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Pictures, Open Book Publishers. pp. 85-98. 2014.
    Aesthetic Symbol SystemsLanguages, Misc
  •  844
    Maps and Meaning
    Journal of Philosophical Research 35 123-128. 2010.
    It's possible to understand an infinite number of novel maps. I argue that Roberto Casati and Achille Varzi's compositional semantics of maps cannot explain this possibility, because it requires an infinite number of semantic primitives. So the semantics of maps is puzzlingly different from the semantics of language.
    Truth-Conditional TheoriesDepiction
  •  1616
    Depiction and convention
    Dialectica 62 (3): 335-348. 2008.
    By defining both depictive and linguistic representation as kinds of symbol system, Nelson Goodman attempts to undermine the platitude that, whereas linguistic representation is mediated by convention, depiction is mediated by resemblance. I argue that Goodman is right to draw a strong analogy between the two kinds of representation, but wrong to draw the counterintuitive conclusion that depiction is not mediated by resemblance.
    Nelson GoodmanLinguistic ConventionAesthetic Symbol SystemsDepiction
  •  1373
    Fact, Fiction, and Fantasy
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy 39 (1): 46-57. 2015.
    This paper argues: (1) All knowledge from fiction is from imagination (2) All knowledge from imagination is modal knowledge (3) So, all knowledge from fiction is modal knowledge Moreover, some knowledge is from fiction, so (1)-(3) are non-vacuously true.
    Conceivability, Imagination, and PossibilityFiction, MiscLiterature and KnowledgeEpistemology of Ima…Read more
    Conceivability, Imagination, and PossibilityFiction, MiscLiterature and KnowledgeEpistemology of Imagination
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback