• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Alex Silk

University of Birmingham
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    34
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    3
  •  News and Updates
    13
  •  Teaching Materials
    2

 More details
  • University of Birmingham
    Department of Philosophy
    Associate Professor
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
PhD, 2013
Email (login required)
CV
Homepage
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0000-0002-9341-9411
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Language
Meta-Ethics
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Law
Normative Ethics
Friedrich Nietzsche
Epistemology
20th Century Philosophy
Value Theory
1 more
  • All publications (34)
  •  502
    Evidence Sensitivity in Weak Necessity Deontic Modals
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4): 691-723. 2014.
    Kolodny and MacFarlane have made a pioneering contribution to our understanding of how the interpretation of deontic modals can be sensitive to evidence and information. But integrating the discussion of information-sensitivity into the standard Kratzerian framework for modals suggests ways of capturing the relevant data without treating deontic modals as “informational modals” in their sense. I show that though one such way of capturing the data within the standard semantics fails, an alternati…Read more
    Kolodny and MacFarlane have made a pioneering contribution to our understanding of how the interpretation of deontic modals can be sensitive to evidence and information. But integrating the discussion of information-sensitivity into the standard Kratzerian framework for modals suggests ways of capturing the relevant data without treating deontic modals as “informational modals” in their sense. I show that though one such way of capturing the data within the standard semantics fails, an alternative does not. Nevertheless I argue that we have good reasons to adopt an information-sensitive semantics of the general type Kolodny and MacFarlane describe. Contrary to the standard semantics, relative deontic value between possibilities sometimes depends on which possibilities are live. I develop an ordering semantics for deontic modals that captures this point and addresses various complications introduced by integrating the discussion of information-sensitivity into the standard semantic framework. By attending to these complexities, we can also illuminate various roles that information and evidence play in logical arguments, discourse, and deliberation.
    Logical ExpressionsTruth-Conditional Accounts of Indicative ConditionalsIndicative Conditionals, Mis…Read more
    Logical ExpressionsTruth-Conditional Accounts of Indicative ConditionalsIndicative Conditionals, MiscDeontic ModalsLogic of ConditionalsDynamic SemanticsConditionals, MiscDiscourse Representation
  •  416
    Nietzschean Constructivism: Ethics and Metaethics for All and None
    Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (3): 244-280. 2015.
    This paper develops an interpretation of Nietzsche’s ethics and metaethics that reconciles his apparent antirealism with his engagement in normative discourse. Interpreting Nietzsche as a metaethical constructivist—as holding, to a first approximation, that evaluative facts are grounded purely in facts about the evaluative attitudes of the creatures to whom they apply—reconciles his vehement declarations that nothing is valuable in itself with his passionate expressions of a particular evaluativ…Read more
    This paper develops an interpretation of Nietzsche’s ethics and metaethics that reconciles his apparent antirealism with his engagement in normative discourse. Interpreting Nietzsche as a metaethical constructivist—as holding, to a first approximation, that evaluative facts are grounded purely in facts about the evaluative attitudes of the creatures to whom they apply—reconciles his vehement declarations that nothing is valuable in itself with his passionate expressions of a particular evaluative perspective and injunctions for the free spirits to create new values. Drawing on Nietzsche’s broader epistemological and psychological views, I develop a distinctive, and genuinely Nietzschean, version of constructivism. On this account, evaluative properties are grounded in affective valuations of the new philosophers. The proposed interpretation synthesizes a variety of disparate features of Nietzsche’s writings and improves on existing interpretations in the literature. The resulting version of constr..
    EthicsNietzsche: Meta-EthicsNietzsche: OvermanNietzsche: NihilismMoral IrrealismNietzsche: Moral Psy…Read more
    EthicsNietzsche: Meta-EthicsNietzsche: OvermanNietzsche: NihilismMoral IrrealismNietzsche: Moral PsychologyNietzsche: Value Theory, MiscellaneousMoral ConstructivismMoral Realism
  •  405
    Whither anankastics?
    with Billy Dunaway
    Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1): 75-94. 2014.
    ConditionalsModal ExpressionsAttitude AscriptionsCompositionalityContext and Context-Dependence
  •  1038
    Having it Both Ways: Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics
    Analysis 77 (1): 197-211. 2017.
    Moral Language, MiscMoral SemanticsMoral ExpressivismMoral CognitivismPresuppositionMoral JudgmentUs…Read more
    Moral Language, MiscMoral SemanticsMoral ExpressivismMoral CognitivismPresuppositionMoral JudgmentUse-Conditional SemanticsMoral NoncognitivismImplicature
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback