-
Deborah L. Rhode, Speaking of Sex. The Denial of Gender Inequality (review)Ethical Perspectives 5 (1): 75-77. 1998.
-
2Capability and agencyIn Christopher W. Morris (ed.), Amartya Sen, Cambridge University Press. 2009.
-
75Are transcendental theories of justice redundant?Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2). 2012.Journal of Economic Methodology, Volume 19, Issue 2, Page 159-163, June 2012
-
1Sociale rechtvaardigheid, socio-demografische veranderingen, en de nieuwe welvaartsstaatAlgemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 3. 2007.
-
29De rol en beperkingen van ideaaltheorieën van rechtvaardigheidTijdschrift Voor Filosofie 71 (1): 61-85. 2009.
-
111Assessing global poverty and inequality: Income, resources, and capabilitiesMetaphilosophy 36 (1‐2): 30-49. 2005.Are global poverty and inequality on the rise or are they declining? And is the quality of life of the world's poorest people getting worse or better? These questions are often given conflicting answers by economists, the World Bank, and social activists. One reason for this is that assessments of quality of life can be made in terms of people's income, their resources, or their functionings and capabilities. This essay discusses the pros and cons of these evaluative approaches, and it argues th…Read more
-
304Trois modèles « éducatifs » : droit, potentialité et capital humainLes ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 6 (1): 18-29. 2011.Dans cet article, j’analyse trois logiques normatives qui peuvent fonder les politiques éducatives en portant une attention particulière aux questions liées aux spécificités des sexes. Ces trois modèles éducatifs sont la théorie du capital humain, le discours du droit et l’approche des potentialités. D’abord, je décris cinq rôles que l’éducation peut jouer. Ensuite, j’analyse les trois modèles pouvant fonder les politiques éducatives. La théorie du capital humain pose un certain nombre de problè…Read more
-
42Property-Owning DemocracyIn M. O'Neill T. Williamson (ed.), Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond, Wiley-blackwell. pp. 163. 2012.
-
525CapabilitarianismJournal of Human Development and Capabilities. forthcoming.This paper offers a critique of Martha Nussbaum’s description of the capability approach, and offers an alternative. I will argue that Nussbaum’s characterization of the capability approach is flawed, in two ways. First, she unduly limits the capability to two strands of work, thereby ignoring important other capabilitarian scholarship. Second, she argues that there are five essential elements that all capability theories meet; yet upon closer analysis three of them are not really essential to t…Read more
-
4Justice as Fairness and the Capability ApproachIn Kaushik Basu & Ravi Kanbur (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen: Volume I: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement and Volume Ii: Society, Institutions, and Development, Oxford University Press. 2008.
-
49Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy - by David A. CrockerEthics and International Affairs 23 (4): 426-427. 2009.No Abstract
-
13Approach (and social justice)In Gerald F. Gaus & Fred D'Agostino (eds.), The Routledge companion to social and political philosophy, Routledge. pp. 456. 2013.
-
76Valuing freedoms: Sen's capability approach and poverty reduction, Sabina alkire. Oxford university press, 2002, VII+340 pages (review)Economics and Philosophy 19 (2): 371-377. 2003.
-
60Is Nancy Fraser's Critique of Theories of Distributive Justice Justified?Constellations 10 (4): 538-554. 2003.
-
246 Capability approachIn Jan Peil & Irene van Staveren (eds.), Handbook of economics and ethics, Edward Elgar. pp. 39. 2009.
-
38Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities (edited book)Cambridge University Press. 2010.This book brings together a team of leading theorists to address the question 'What is the right measure of justice?' Some contributors, following Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, argue that we should focus on capabilities, or what people are able to do and to be. Others, following John Rawls, argue for focussing on social primary goods, the goods which society produces and which people can use. Still others see both views as incomplete and complementary to one another. Their essays evaluate the…Read more