• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Adam Swift

University College London
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    39
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    8
  •  News and Updates
    12

 More details
  • University College London
    Professor
  • All publications (39)
  •  54
    Inconsistency in Beliefs about Distributive Justice: A Cautionary Note
    with Carole Burgoyne and Gordon Marshall
    Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23 (4): 327-342. 1993.
    JusticeEqualityDistributive Justice
  •  228
    Family Values: The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships
    with Harry Brighouse
    Princeton University Press. 2014.
    The family is hotly contested ideological terrain. Some defend the traditional two-parent heterosexual family while others welcome its demise. Opinions vary about how much control parents should have over their children's upbringing. Family Values provides a major new theoretical account of the morality and politics of the family, telling us why the family is valuable, who has the right to parent, and what rights parents should—and should not—have over their children. Harry Brighouse and Adam Sw…Read more
    The family is hotly contested ideological terrain. Some defend the traditional two-parent heterosexual family while others welcome its demise. Opinions vary about how much control parents should have over their children's upbringing. Family Values provides a major new theoretical account of the morality and politics of the family, telling us why the family is valuable, who has the right to parent, and what rights parents should—and should not—have over their children. Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift argue that parent-child relationships produce the "familial relationship goods" that people need to flourish. Children's healthy development depends on intimate relationships with authoritative adults, while the distinctive joys and challenges of parenting are part of a fulfilling life for adults. Yet the relationships that make these goods possible have little to do with biology, and do not require the extensive rights that parents currently enjoy. Challenging some of our most commonly held beliefs about the family, Brighouse and Swift explain why a child's interest in autonomy severely limits parents' right to shape their children's values, and why parents have no fundamental right to confer wealth or advantage on their children. Family Values reaffirms the vital importance of the family as a social institution while challenging its role in the reproduction of social inequality and carefully balancing the interests of parents and children.
  •  11
    Putting Educational Equality in its Place
    with Harry Brighouse
    Educational Policy and Finance 3 (4): 444-466. 2008.
    Desert and Distributive JusticeEquality of OpportunityAcademic and Teaching Ethics
  •  112
    Family values reconsidered: a response
    with Harry Brighouse
    Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (3): 385-405. 2018.
    Justice, MiscSocial Ethics
  •  94
    A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, edited by Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit, Oxford and Cambridge MA, Blackwell, 1993, pp. viii + 679
    Utilitas 7 (1): 184. 1995.
    Normative Ethics, General WorksSocial and Political PhilosophyPolitical Views
  •  2573
    Equality, priority, and positional goods
    with Harry Brighouse
    Ethics 116 (3): 471-497. 2006.
    Priority and PrioritarianismThe Value of Equality
  •  116
    Family Ethics and Public Policy: Beyond the Medical Model
    with Harry Brighouse
    American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11): 56-58. 2018.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  4437
    Educational equality versus educational adequacy: A critique of Anderson and Satz
    with Harry Brighouse
    Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2): 117-128. 2009.
    Some theorists argue that rather than advocating a principle of educational equality as a component of a theory of justice in education, egalitarians should adopt a principle of educational adequacy. This paper looks at two recent attempts to show that adequacy, not equality, constitutes justice in education. It responds to the criticisms of equality by claiming that they are either unsuccessful or merely show that other values are also important, not that equality is not important. It also argu…Read more
    Some theorists argue that rather than advocating a principle of educational equality as a component of a theory of justice in education, egalitarians should adopt a principle of educational adequacy. This paper looks at two recent attempts to show that adequacy, not equality, constitutes justice in education. It responds to the criticisms of equality by claiming that they are either unsuccessful or merely show that other values are also important, not that equality is not important. It also argues that a principle of educational adequacy cannot be all there is to justice in education.
    Academic and Teaching EthicsEqualityPolitical Ethics
  •  19
    Family
    with Harry Brighouse
    In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Wiley-blackwell. 2013.
    Children's Well-Being
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback