• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Michael Louis Corrado

University of North Carolina (System)
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    41
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    7

 More details
  • University of North Carolina (System)
    Regular Faculty
Brown University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1970
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Law
20th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (41)
  •  58
    A Note on Harman on Intending
    Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (3): 105-108. 1978.
    Intentions
  •  78
    On believing inscriptions to be true
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (1): 59-73. 1975.
  •  72
    Review of Teleological Realism: Mind, Agency, and Explanation, by Scott Sehon (review)
    Essays in Philosophy 11 (2): 231-237. 2010.
    Reasons and Causes
  •  46
    Egalitarianism and the Problem of Tort Liability
    Philosophical Issues 11 (1): 388-419. 2001.
  •  123
    Addiction and responsibility: An introduction (review)
    Law and Philosophy 18 (6): 579-588. 1999.
    Compulsion and AddictionPhilosophy of Law
  •  118
    The Brentano-Vailati correspondence
    with Roderick M. Chisholm
    Topoi 1 (1-2): 3-30. 1982.
    Brentano's WorksBrentano: Metaphysics
  •  132
    What De Re Belief Is Not
    Analysis 35 (6): 188-192. 1975.
    Belief
  •  68
    Professor Chisholm and the Criterion
    Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (2): 55-57. 1978.
    Roderick Chisholm
  •  200
    Crime and culpability: A theory of criminal law * by Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler ferzan, with Stephen Morse
    Analysis 70 (2): 403-405. 2010.
    No abstract is available for this citation
    Philosophy of Law
  •  81
    Proper names and necessary properties
    Philosophical Studies 24 (2): 112-118. 1973.
    It has been proposed that, Under the restriction of singular terms to proper names, Singular de re propositions would be equivalent to certain de dicto propositions. But that is so only if a certain thesis--A thesis which is itself irreducibly de re--Is true of proper names. The conclusion is that the restriction to proper names is not, By itself, Sufficient to render the de re and de dicto equivalent.
  •  61
    Trying
    American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (2): 195-205. 1983.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback