• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Paul Komesaroff

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    70
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    45

 More details
  • All publications (70)
  • Introduction: postmodern medical ethics
    In Paul A. Komesaroff (ed.), Troubled bodies: critical perspectives on postmodernism, medical ethics, and the body, Duke University Press. pp. 1--19. 1995.
    Medical Ethics
  •  55
    Editorial
    with Ian Kerridge
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1): 1-1. 2008.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  36
    The Ethics of Diagnosis
    with Jose Luis Peset and Diego Gracia
    Bioethics 8 (2): 178-179. 1994.
    Ethics
  •  8
    Reconciliation and the technics of healing
    with Elizabeth Molloy and Paul James
  •  54
    Commentary on" A Phenomenology of Dyslexia"
    with John Wiltshire
    Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 5 (1): 21-23. 1998.
    PhenomenologyMental IllnessPhilosophy of Psychiatry and Psychopathology, MiscCognitive Disabilities …Read more
    PhenomenologyMental IllnessPhilosophy of Psychiatry and Psychopathology, MiscCognitive Disabilities and Disorders, Misc
  •  4
    Bioethics in Australia : on politics, power, and the rise of the Christian right
    with Rob Irvine and Ian Kerridge
    In Catherine Myser (ed.), Bioethics Around the Globe, Oxford University Press. pp. 245-268. 2011.
    This chapter talks about Australian bioethics and highlights the argument that bioethics have never been above the political struggle for power and influence in the public marketplace of ideas. It describes the Australasian Bioethics Association, as it purposely moves bioethics discourse beyond philosophical or theological inquiry. The chapter concludes with an analysis of bioethics, as it functions as a political field through which the Christian right competes against secular science, bioethic…Read more
    This chapter talks about Australian bioethics and highlights the argument that bioethics have never been above the political struggle for power and influence in the public marketplace of ideas. It describes the Australasian Bioethics Association, as it purposely moves bioethics discourse beyond philosophical or theological inquiry. The chapter concludes with an analysis of bioethics, as it functions as a political field through which the Christian right competes against secular science, bioethics, and liberal ideology in order to amplify religious doctrines, traditional family values and ethics, and social order in Australian society and politics.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  67
    Troubled bodies: critical perspectives on postmodernism, medical ethics, and the body (edited book)
    Duke University Press. 1995.
    These essays examine the ways in which the consideration of ethical questions is shaped by the structures of knowledge and communication at work in clinical ...
    Medical Ethics
  •  79
    In that Case
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2): 219-220. 2011.
    Biomedical EthicsPublic Health
  •  160
    It is time to move beyond a culture of unexamined assumptions, recrimination, and blame to one of systematic analysis and ethical dialogue
    with Ian Kerridge
    American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1). 2011.
    This Article does not have an abstract
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  68
    Republication: In That Case (review)
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3): 307-308. 2011.
    Biomedical Ethics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback