•  118
    Leibniz and Adam (review)
    The Leibniz Review 5 29-32. 1995.
    The book under review contains a selection of the papers presented at the conference “Leibniz and Adam,” held in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem from December 29, 1991 to January 2, 1992. The object of the conference and the book was to consider the role of Adam, the first man, in Leibniz’s thought and, in doing so, “to provide an unusual view of the interrelations between his metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, theory of knowledge, logic, attidude vis-à-vis mysticism, philosophy…Read more
  •  92
    Kuehn, Manfred. Kant: A Biography (review)
    Review of Metaphysics 55 (4): 865-866. 2002.
  •  8
    Continuum Companion to Leibniz (edited book)
    Continuum. 2011.
    With entries written by leading scholars in the field of Modern Philosophy, this Companion is an accessible and authoritative reference guide to Leibniz's life, work and legacy. The book includes extended biographical sketches, and an up-to-date fully comprehensive bibliography. Gathering all these resources in one place, the book is an extremely valuable tool for those interested in Leibniz and the era in which he wrote"--Back cover.
  • Roger S. Woolhouse: Leibniz's' New System'(1695)
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1): 173-175. 1999.
  •  818
    Leibniz and the Substance of the Vinculum Substantiale
    Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2): 203-220. 2000.
    This paper analyzes Leibniz's notorious 'vinculum substantiale', or 'substantial bond', as it appears in his correspondence with the Jesuit philosopher and theologian, Bartholomew Des Bosses. It is shown that, while Leibniz employs the vinculum to address a problem relating to the unity of corporeal substance, it ultimately violates other key principles in his philosophy.
  •  32
    Leibniz and the Shelf of Essence
    The Leibniz Review 15 27-47. 2005.
    This paper addresses D. C. Williams’s question, “How can Leibniz know that he is a member of the actual world and not merely a possible monad on the shelf of essence?” A variety of answers are considered. Ultimately, it is argued that no particular perception of a state of affairs in the world can warrant knowledge of one’s actuality, nor can the awareness of any property within oneself; rather, it is the nature of experience itself, with the flow of perceptions, that guarantees our actuality. A…Read more