Ilexa Yardley

The 'singularity' in Nature is a concrete-abstraction (think: tokenization) of the circular-linear relationship between 'me' and 'you.' Also, known as, 'me' and 'me' ('you' and 'you'). (Any and every 'me.') (Any and every 'you'.) Explaining the ontology, and, thus, the epistemology, of technology and finance (physics and psychology) (biology and philosophy). The abstract 'object.' The notion of 'self.' Any NFT (non-fungible and-or fungible token). The 'genetics of information.' The 'tokenized' state.

Conservation of the Circle is The Singularity that controls the relationship between Mind and Matter (Abstract and Concrete ‘Reality’). Explaining Why 50–50 is the Only Constant in Nature. Why All of Us Are Held Hostage by Magical Thinking. Explaining the 50–50 Ups and Downs in all Disciplines. An Abstract Circle Joining and Separating any X and Y Controls Everything in Concrete Reality. The Neutron and the Proton provide the Prototype for this Relationship. Explaining Why 50-50 is the only Constant in Nature. Observation provides Half of the Picture (the Other Half remains Hidden at All Times). This Forces Observation Errors in All Disciplines. The Circular Theory Universal System Architecture Overcomes Observation Errors. Clarifying the Relationship Between Human and Machine Intelligence. Dramatically Improving the Performance of Modern Computers and Human Performance in All Systems. Once it is Fully Understood. Circumference and Diameter are the Technical Terms for Zero and One in Technology, One and Two in Mathematics, Explaining All of the Symbols Humans Use to Inter-React with Nature. The Circular Theory Diagram and the words 'Conservation of the Circle' is the only Error-Free Concrete Abstraction (The Singularity) for What Humans Experience as Reality. (What Nature Experiences as Itself.) The Circular Theory Diagram shows the Circular-Linear Relationship between a Circumference and a Diameter (A Zero and A One). See The Ontology of Mind, also by Ilexa Yardley on PhilPapers.

Information, and, thus, technology (any and every system and-or discipline), depends upon the tokenization (and, thus, the conservation) of a circle (one zero and one one) (one circumference and one diameter). Explaining the human mind, the ‘abstract object,’ and the cryptic universe. Where any (and every) ‘universe’ (think: unit) is totally dependent on the circular-linear relationship between abstract and concrete reality (which is fully accessible (and, thus, only, understandable)) via the Circular Theory diagram (a cryptic, concrete, fully tokenized, abstraction) (for an uber-simple circle).

Why Mathematics Can Never ‘Explain’ Reality: Well, for one thing, as everybody knows, there is no ‘Reality.’ All symbolic systems require the conservation of a circle, which is the core, and, thus, the only, dynamic in Nature. It is not possible to have X without Y (X without one other X) because it is not possible to have a circumference (a zero) without a diameter (a one). So, this proves the token for 'tokenization' that is necessary for general relativity (more technically, universal relativity) (what humans call 'reality') requires duplication (which is, technically, another word for negation). This explains why identity is another word for 'representation' and, always, vice versa. Where everything in Nature is a token for (what humans know as) the arithmetic number 'two.' (Because it is impossible to have a half without a whole, and, again, always, vice versa.) Technically, negating all of the 'numbers' (all of the symbolic representations) humans assume are 'realities' in Nature.

Space joins (and separates) any X and-or Y.   X and-or Y is, necessarily, 0 and-or 1.   0 and-or 1 is, necessarily, circumference and-or diameter.   Explaining (what humans think of as) gravity (general relativity) (the 'self' in all systems). Thereby, and, therein, explaining the relationship between mind and matter. Integrating philosophy and physics (abstract and concrete reality) (where you need both in order to have either). Thereby, and, therein, explaining everything in psychology (a completely tokenized ‘reality’). You can think of this as philosophical, physical, and psychological fusion (absolute relativity).

IOP is, always, the tokenization of a naturally conserved circle. Meaning no information, no reality, no nothing. Observation always gets us the wrong answer (no such thing as a question, technically) (all questions are already answered) (the human imagines there are problems to solve) (because solving problems conserves an already-conserved circle) (everything is already 'answered') (else how could we ascertain the 'correct' answer?). Tokenization may appear as a transformation. But digging deeper we can observe (when we're ready) there is no such thing as a transformation. Tokenization (the correct word for transformation) is the conservation of a circle, explaining IOP (what humans perceive as 'transformation' 'representation' 'tokenization' a 'process' of any kind' (nouns and verbs in general) etc).