-
54Plantinga’s New Argument against MaterialismPhilosophia Christi 14 (1): 29-47. 2012.In this paper, I have attempted to do two main things. First, I argue that Alvin Plantinga’s new argument against materialism, though interesting, shares the fate of his earlier arguments in that it is, in the end, unsuccessful. Secondly, I then argue, contrary to Plantinga’s view that there is no strong argument for materialism, that there is in fact very strong scientific support that can be offered against the hypothesis that the human mind is an immaterial substance, and hence in support of …Read more
-
88Freedom and ForeknowledgeFaith and Philosophy 17 (2): 212-224. 2000.In her book, The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge, Linda Zagzebski suggests that among the strongest ways of supporting the thesis that libertarian free will is incompatible with divine foreknowledge is what she refers to as the Accidental Necessity argument. Zagzebski contends, however, that at least three satisfactory responses to that argument are available.I argue that two of the proposed solutions are open to strong objections, and that the third, although it may very well handle the sp…Read more
-
3Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley: Knowledge of GodInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (2): 105-107. 2009.
-
13Particulars, actuality, and identity over time (edited book)Garland. 1999.First Published in 1999. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
-
3Closing statement and reponse to Plantinga's commentsIn Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God, Wiley-blackwell. 2008.This chapter contains sections titled: Plantinga's Responses to My Two Arguments Is Belief in God Non‐Inferentially Justified? The Argument from Evil Versus Justifications for Believing in the Existence of God Concluding Comment: Naturalism, Supernaturalism, and Theism.
APA Western Division
Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
11 more