-
45Closing statement and reponse to Plantinga's commentsIn Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God, Wiley-blackwell. 2009.This chapter contains sections titled: Plantinga's Responses to My Two Arguments Is Belief in God Non‐Inferentially Justified? The Argument from Evil Versus Justifications for Believing in the Existence of God Concluding Comment: Naturalism, Supernaturalism, and Theism.
-
237Alvin Plantinga and the argument from evilAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (4). 1980.Among the central theses defended in this paper are the following. First, the logical incompatibility version of the argument from evil is not one of the crucial versions, and Plantinga, in fostering the illusion that it is, seriously misrepresents claims advanced by other philosophers. Secondly, Plantinga’s arguments against the thesis that the existence of any evil at all is logically incompatible with God’s existence. Thirdly, Plantinga’s attempt to demonstrate that the existence of a certain…Read more
-
174The Nature of Causation: A Singularist AccountCanadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (sup1): 271-322. 1990.Is a singularist conception of causation coherent? That is to say, is it possible for two events to be causally related, without that relationship being an instance of some causal law, either basic or derived, and either probabilistic or non-probabilistic? Since the time of Hume, the overwhelmingly dominant philosophical view has been that such a conception of causation is not coherent.
-
341Laws of NaturePhilosophical Review 106 (1): 119. 1997.In this book, John Carroll argues for the following two anti-reductionist theses
-
Causation and supervenienceIn Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metaphysics, Oxford University Press. pp. 386-434. 2003.
APA Western Division
Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
11 more