-
14This Is Not SufficientSymposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 11 (1): 79-100. 2007.
-
18“Relire Merleau-Ponty à la lumière des inédits”: A One Day Conference held at the Husserl Archives of ParisChiasmi International 8 353-358. 2006.
-
9The event of deconstruction: A response to a responseJournal of the British Society for Phenomenology 27 (3): 317-319. 1996.
-
15Gilles Deleuze and Hearing-Oneself-SpeakIn Lester Embree & Thomas Nenon (eds.), Husserl’s Ideen, Springer. pp. 451--466. 2013.
-
50Waiting and lateness: The context, implications, and basic argumentation of Derrida's “awaiting (at) the arrival” (s'attendre à l'arrivée) in aporiasResearch in Phenomenology 38 (3): 392-403. 2008.In Derrida's last book (posthumously published in 2006), L'animal que donc je suis, there is a kind of refrain: “il ne suffit pas de …” (it is not sufficient or enough to . . . ). Derrida utters this refrain in relation to all the discourses on animality and animal suffering found in the Western philosophical tradition. None of these discourses are sufficient. This last book revolves then around the idea of an insufficient (not enough) response. The idea of an insufficient response is not restri…Read more
-
Verflechtung: The Triple Significance of Merleau-Ponty’s Course Notes on Husserl’s 'The Origin of Geometry'In Maurice Merleau-ponty: Husserl at the limits of phenomenology, Northwestern University Press. 2002.
-
2Asceticism and sexuality : "cheating nature" in Bergson's The two sources of morality and religionIn Alexandre Lefebvre & Melanie Allison White (eds.), Bergson, Politics, and Religion, Duke University Press. 2012.
-
The beginnings of thought : The fundamental experience in Derrida and DeleuzeIn Paul Patton & John Protevi (eds.), Between Deleuze and Derrida, Continuum. 2003.
-
11Voice and Phenomenon: Introduction to the Problem of the Sign in Husserl's Phenomenology (edited book)Northwestern University Press. 2010.Published in 1967, when Derrida is 37 years old, Voice and Phenomenon appears at the same moment as Of Grammatology and Writing and Difference. All three books announce the new philosophical project called “deconstruction.” Although Derrida will later regret the fate of the term “deconstruction,” he will use it throughout his career to define his own thinking. While Writing and Difference collects essays written over a 10 year period on diverse figures and topics, and Of Grammatology aims its de…Read more
-
32Résumé: Le chiasme et Ie pli. Une introduction au concept philosophique d’archéologieChiasmi International 4 117-117. 2002.
-
51The Ontology of MemoryEpoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1): 69-102. 2003.This essay attempts to reflect on Bergson’s contribution to the reversal of Platonism. Heidegger, of course, had set the standard for reversing Platonism. Thus the question posed in this essay, following Heidegger, is: does Bergson manage not only to reverse Platonism but also to twist free of it. The answer presented here is that Bergson does twist free, which explains Deleuze’s persistent appropriations of Bergsonian thought. Memory in Bergson turns out to be not a memory of an idea, or even o…Read more
-
10Phenomenology and metaphysics: Deconstruction in La voix et le phénomèneJournal of the British Society for Phenomenology 27 (2): 116-136. 1996.
-
Derrida and Husserl : The Basic Problem of Phenomenology, coll. « Studies in Continental Thought »Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 193 (2): 260-261. 2003.
-
21The Friend of the Future: A Note on Merleau-Ponty’s “Brouillion d’une rédaction”Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 30 (1): 79-86. 2009.
-
16We need a Name for What We Do: Report on Contemporary Merleau-Ponty Research in the United StatesChiasmi International 1 27-34. 1999.
-
23Nature, Course Notes from the Collège de France (review)Review of Metaphysics 59 (3): 663-664. 2006.But for us who are fifty years removed from these courses, they present in the clearest way possible what requirements we must still follow in order to determine what an origin or principle is. Indeed, “principle” is a word that Merleau-Ponty uses repeatedly in the courses. For Merleau-Ponty, the principle must be conceived neither as positive nor negative, neither as infinite nor finite, neither as internal nor external, neither as objective nor subjective; it can be thought neither through ide…Read more