-
22Professional Judgment and Justice: Equal Respect for the Professional Judgment of Critical-Care PhysiciansAmerican Journal of Bioethics 16 (1): 1-2. 2016.
-
19Suicide and the Sufficiency of Surrogate Decision MakersAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (3). 2013.No abstract
-
12The Proper Locus of Professionalization: The Individual or the Institutions?American Journal of Bioethics 15 (5): 1-2. 2015.
-
83The concept of genetic diseaseIn Arthur Caplan, James J. McCartney & Dominic A. Sisti (eds.), Health, Disease, and Illness: Concepts in Medicine, Georgetown University Press. pp. 233--42. 2004.
-
26The Instrumental Role of Hospital Ethics Committees in Policy WorkAmerican Journal of Bioethics 12 (11): 1-2. 2012.No abstract
-
22Overthrowing the Tyranny of the Journal Impact FactorAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (7): 1-2. 2013.No abstract
-
17The AJOB experimentAmerican Journal of Bioethics 1 (1): 1. 2001.This Article does not have an abstract
-
17The meaning of graduate education for bioethicsAmerican Journal of Bioethics 2 (4). 2002.This Article does not have an abstract
-
30A Commentary on Oocyte Donation for Stem Cell Research in South KoreaAmerican Journal of Bioethics 6 (1). 2006.No abstract
-
33Disease Gene Patenting: The Clinician's DilemmaCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4): 433-435. 1998.One strategy for defenders of gene patenting is to adopt a constructivist interpretation of genetic testing to avoid the I argue that accepting this view (which seems to be the approach of the U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks) results in an intolerable dilemma for physicians. They must either infringe patents or fail to act on all the medically relevant information they possess (malpractice)
-
40Heuristics and biases in evolutionary biologyBiology and Philosophy 12 (1): 21-38. 1997.Approaching science by considering the epistemological virtues which scientists see as constitutive of good science, and the way these virtues trade-off against one another, makes it possible to capture action that may be lost by approaches which focus on either the theoretical or institutional level. Following Wimsatt (1984) I use the notion of heuristics and biases to help explore a case study from the history of biology. Early in the 20th century, mutation theorists and natural historians fou…Read more
-
16Down the Primrose PathIn Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Biology and epistemology, Cambridge University Press. pp. 91. 1999.
-
Biology & epistemologyIn Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Biology and epistemology, Cambridge University Press. 1999.
-
4The SUPPORT Controversy and the Debate Over Research Within the Standard of CareAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (12): 1-2. 2013.No abstract
-
12Innocent Fun or “Microslavery”?Hastings Center Report 44 (6): 38-46. 2014.In 2011, Ingmar Riedel‐Kruse's bioengineering laboratory at Stanford University publicized an application that uses paramecia for what the researchers termed “biotic games.” These games make use of living organisms, computer programs, and lab equipment to implement games like Pong, Pac‐man, and soccer. Gamesand related activities are often considered nonserious or trivial, whereas life, biological systems, and science are treated very seriously in moral analysis and public perception. The manipu…Read more
-
3Politics and Peer reviewAmerican Journal of Bioethics 4 (1). 2004.This Article does not have an abstract
-
10Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics ConsultationAmerican Journal of Bioethics 16 (3): 1-2. 2016.
-
18CPR and Ventricular Assist Devices: The Challenge of Prolonging Life Without Guaranteeing HealthAmerican Journal of Bioethics 17 (2): 1-2. 2017.
-
39Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in ResearchAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (4). 2013.(2013). Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in Research. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.778645
Stanford, California, United States of America