-
47Politics and Peer reviewAmerican Journal of Bioethics 4 (1). 2004.This Article does not have an abstract
-
100Evolution without change in Gene frequenciesBiology and Philosophy 13 (2): 255-261. 1998.Biologists often define evolution as a change in allele frequencies. Consideration of the evolution of the pocket mouse will show that it is possible to have evolution without any change in the allele frequencies in a population (through change in the genotype frequencies). The implications of this for genic selectionism are then discussed. Sober and Lewontin (1982) have constructed an example to demonstrate the blindness of genic selectionism in certain cases. Sterelny and Kitcher (1988) offer …Read more
-
96Suicide and the Sufficiency of Surrogate Decision MakersAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (3). 2013.No abstract
-
115Disease Gene Patenting: The Clinician's DilemmaCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4): 433-435. 1998.One strategy for defenders of gene patenting is to adopt a constructivist interpretation of genetic testing to avoid the I argue that accepting this view (which seems to be the approach of the U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks) results in an intolerable dilemma for physicians. They must either infringe patents or fail to act on all the medically relevant information they possess (malpractice)
-
74CPR and Ventricular Assist Devices: The Challenge of Prolonging Life Without Guaranteeing HealthAmerican Journal of Bioethics 17 (2): 1-2. 2017.
-
86Translating Stem Cell Research: Challenges at the Research FrontierJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2): 267-276. 2010.There are many kinds of clinical trials. The regulatory framework within which most drug development takes place appears to be the one that is to be applied to the development of novel stem cell-based clinical trials. In the standard drug development model, appropriate pre-clinical research is conducted, and investigators or research sponsors submit an investigational new drug application to the Food and Drug Administration.If approved, typical clinical trials start with Phase I, which is usuall…Read more
-
63Sexless Reproduction: A Status SymbolAmerican Journal of Bioethics 11 (3): 1-1. 2011.This Article does not have an abstract
-
105The History of The American Journal of BioethicsAmerican Journal of Bioethics 10 (10): 3-3. 2010.This Article does not have an abstract
-
49Playing it safeAmerican Journal of Bioethics 7 (3). 2007.This Article does not have an abstract
-
108Blood, sweat and tearsAmerican Journal of Bioethics 6 (3). 2006.This Article does not have an abstract
-
92The Instrumental Role of Hospital Ethics Committees in Policy WorkAmerican Journal of Bioethics 12 (11): 1-2. 2012.No abstract
-
87Theory, practice, and epistemology in the development of species conceptsStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4): 521-545. 1996.
-
57Organizational Needs Versus Ethics Committee PracticeAmerican Journal of Bioethics 9 (4): 1-2. 2009.No abstract
-
96Clinical Ethics Consultation: A Need for EvidenceAmerican Journal of Bioethics 15 (1): 1-2. 2015.
-
132Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in ResearchAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (4). 2013.(2013). Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in Research. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.778645
-
105A Commentary on Oocyte Donation for Stem Cell Research in South KoreaAmerican Journal of Bioethics 6 (1). 2006.No abstract
-
83Professional Judgment and Justice: Equal Respect for the Professional Judgment of Critical-Care PhysiciansAmerican Journal of Bioethics 16 (1): 1-2. 2016.
-
45Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics ConsultationAmerican Journal of Bioethics 16 (3): 1-2. 2016.
Stanford, California, United States of America