•  3
    In this paper I intend to demonstrate how Merleau-Ponty develops in his late thought an insightful account of reality. In opposition to the ontological primacy Husserl and Heidegger bestow to man, Merleau-Ponty’s late perspective is based on a dynamic ontology, namely on a philosophical understanding of the strict relation between nature and consciousness. With this respect, Merleau- Ponty approaches the problem of negativity, in order to explain the differences within reality without adopting a…Read more
  •  12
    La metafisica del processo, di cui Process and Reality è il manifesto e la attuazione, non nasce dal nulla, ma al contrario emerge da una complessa e prolungata meditazione condotta da Whitehead sin dai primi scritti, di carattere logico e matematico, e passa poi per una articolata riflessione sui problemi fondamentali dell’epistemologia delle scienze naturali, condotta alla luce della rivoluzione concettuale generata dalle ricerche di Einstein ma anche di molti altri studiosi.Per situare quindi…Read more
  •  3
    Introduction
    Discipline filosofiche. 24 (2): 5-7. 2014.
  •  15
    L’esperienza del dolore. Modelli concettuali a confronto
    Philosophical Readings 8 (1): 46-52. 2016.
  •  14
    Interview
    with Carlo Sini and Luca Gaeta
    Chromatikon 3 278-281. 2007.
  •  55
    In this paper the complex phenomenon of pain is discussed and analysed along different theoretical paths: cognitivism, hermeneutics, phenomenology. The neuro-cognitive approach is exemplified through Paul and Patricia Churchland’s writings; then H.-G. Gadamer’s hermeneutical approach is evaluated. While apparently opposite, they share a common assumption, namely that the body is basically to be conceived of as not really different from the Cartesian Res extensa. Some problems thus arise: in part…Read more
  •  23
    Interview
    with Carlo Sini and Luca Gaeta
    Chromatikon 3 278-281. 2007.
  •  20
    Il principio barbaro. Merleau-Ponty lettore di Schelling
    Giornale di Metafisica 25 (1): 95-108. 2003.