-
45Which Subjects Should an IRB Protect? Two Moral ModelsIRB: Ethics & Human Research 4 (7): 5. 1982.
-
65Political liberalism and Confucian democracyPhilosophical Forum 52 (1): 3-4. 2021.The Philosophical Forum, Volume 52, Issue 1, Page 3-4, Spring 2021.
-
58AFTERWORDS Criticism and CounterthesesJournal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (2): 267-274. 1973.
-
221Douglas P. Lackey -- the moral case for unilateral nuclear disarmamentPhilosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4): 157-171. 1984.
-
77Case Studies: Can a Healthy Subject Volunteer to Be Injured in Research?Hastings Center Report 16 (4): 31. 1986.
-
The evolution of the modern terrorist state: area bombing and nuclear deterrenceIn Igor Primoratz (ed.), Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues, Palgrave-macmillan. 2004.
-
95Atheism, philosophy, pornography, and sodomy: The first libertinesPhilosophical Forum 42 (4): 347-350. 2011.
-
1Post war environmental damage : a study in jus post bellumIn Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.), International Criminal Law and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press. 2010.
-
48Review of Larry may, Aggression and Crimes Against Peace (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (8). 2008.
-
60Empirical disconfirmation and ethical counter-exampleJournal of Value Inquiry 10 (1): 30-34. 1976.
-
43The American Debate on Nuclear Weapons PolicyAnalyse & Kritik 9 (1-2): 7-46. 1987.Criticism of nuclear weapons policies often misses the target through ignorance of the policies that are actually in effect. This essay recounts the development of American nuclear weapons policies, together with a history of the criticisms of these policies presented by nuclear strategists and moral philosophers.
-
156Missiles and morals: A utilitarian look at nuclear deterrencePhilosophy and Public Affairs 11 (3): 189-231. 1982.
-
55The Morality of Defensive War edited by Cécile Fabre & Seth Lazar 2014 Oxford, Oxford University Press272 pp., £35.00 (review)Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (1): 111-113. 2015.
-
67Extraordinary Evil or Common Malevolence? Evaluating the Jewish HolocaustJournal of Applied Philosophy 3 (2): 167-181. 1986.This essay considers and rejects the hypothesis of Fackenheim, Wiesel and others that the Jewish Holocaust contains some qualitatively or quantitatively distinct moral evil. The Holocaust was not qualitatively distinct because the intentions and vices of the mass murderer are qualitatively indistinguishable from the intentions and vices of the common murderer. The Holocaust was not quantitatively distinct either because the sum of the evils of the Holocaust is quantitatively indistinguishable fr…Read more
-
86Review: Trenton Merricks, Propositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 321 + xiii pages; $42.68/hardcover (review)Philosophical Forum 47 (1): 107-109. 2016.