• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

E. J. Lowe
(1950 - 2014)

PhD: University of OxfordLast affiliation: Durham University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    354
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    74

 More details
  • Durham University
    Department of Philosophy
    Unknown
University of Oxford
Faculty of Philosophy
DPhil, 1975
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Physical Science
1 more
  • All publications (354)
  •  994
    Two notions of being: Entity and essence
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62 23-48. 2008.
    s div class="title" a terTwo Notions of Being: Entity and Essence s /div a ter - Volume 62 - E. J. Lowe.
    Essence and Essentialism, Misc
  • Perception: A causal representative theory
    In Edmond Leo Wright (ed.), New Representationalisms: Essays in the Philosophy of Perception, Ashgate. 1993.
    The Causal Theory of Perception
  • Free agency, causation and action explanation
    In Constantine Sandis (ed.), New essays on the explanation of action, Palgrave-macmillan. 2009.
    The WillThe Nature of ActionAgencyReasons and Causes
  •  92
    Reply to over
    Analysis 46 (4): 200-200. 1986.
  •  1
    Journal of Consciousness Studies
    Philosophical Books 38 30-31. 1997.
    Philosophy of Consciousness
  •  2
    Agent Causation
    In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan Reference. 2005.
    Agent Causation
  •  273
    The four-category ontology: reply to Kistler
    Analysis 64 (2): 152-157. 2004.
    Ontology
  •  240
    Ontic indeterminacy of identity unscathed
    Analysis 61 (3). 2001.
    Vague IdentityMetaphysical Indeterminacy
  •  1
    Dispositions and Laws
    Metaphysica 2 5-23. 2001.
    Dispositional Theories of Laws
  •  25
    What the Butler Said
    Philosophy 67 (n/a): 281. 1992.
  •  195
    Reply to Dale
    Analysis 46 (2). 1986.
  •  110
    Philosophy of language
    with María josé Frápolli
    Philosophical Books 46 (2): 158-163. 2005.
    20th Century Philosophy
  •  100
    Truthmaking as Essential Dependence
    In Jean-Maurice Monnoyer (ed.), Metaphysics and Truthmakers, De Gruyter. pp. 237-259. 2007.
    Truthmakers
  •  79
    Noonan On Naming And Predicating
    Analysis 46 (June): 159. 1986.
  •  278
    Coinciding Objects: In Defence of the 'Standard Account'
    Analysis 55 (3). 1995.
    E. J. Lowe; Coinciding objects: in defence of the ‘standard account’, Analysis, Volume 55, Issue 3, 1 July 1995, Pages 171–178, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/5.
    Material ObjectsCoincident Objects
  •  345
    Vague Identity and Quantum Indeterminacy
    Analysis 54 (2). 1994.
    Vague IdentityMetaphysical Indeterminacy
  •  70
    Review of Maria Elisabeth Reicher (ed.), States of Affairs (review)
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10). 2009.
  •  164
    In defence of the simplicity argument
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1). 2000.
    This Article does not have an abstract
  •  11
    Booknotes: Booknotes
    Philosophy 67 (260): 271-272. 1992.
  •  289
    Subjects of Experience
    Cambridge University Press. 1996.
    In this innovative study of the relationship between persons and their bodies, E. J. Lowe demonstrates the inadequacy of physicalism, even in its mildest, non-reductionist guises, as a basis for a scientifically and philosophically acceptable account of human beings as subjects of experience, thought and action. He defends a substantival theory of the self as an enduring and irreducible entity - a theory which is unashamedly committed to a distinctly non-Cartesian dualism of self and body. Takin…Read more
    In this innovative study of the relationship between persons and their bodies, E. J. Lowe demonstrates the inadequacy of physicalism, even in its mildest, non-reductionist guises, as a basis for a scientifically and philosophically acceptable account of human beings as subjects of experience, thought and action. He defends a substantival theory of the self as an enduring and irreducible entity - a theory which is unashamedly committed to a distinctly non-Cartesian dualism of self and body. Taking up the physicalist challenge to any robust form of psychophysical interactionism, he shows how an attribution of independent causal powers to the mental states of human subjects is perfectly consistent with a thoroughly naturalistic world view. He concludes his study by examining in detail the role which conscious mental states play in the human subject's exercise of its most central capacities for perception, action, thought and self-knowledge.
    Metaphysics of MindPhilosophy of ConsciousnessThe SelfVolitional Theories of ActionAgent CausationTh…Read more
    Metaphysics of MindPhilosophy of ConsciousnessThe SelfVolitional Theories of ActionAgent CausationThe Structure of ActionNoncausal Theories of ActionReasons and CausesAction Theory, MiscellaneousVolitionThe WillAspects of Consciousness
  •  227
    Mctaggart's paradox revisited
    Mind 101 (402): 323-326. 1992.
    McTaggart's Argument
  •  2
    Book reviews (review)
    Mind 95 (377): 135-138. 1986.
  •  117
    The topology of visual appearance
    Erkenntnis 25 (3): 271-274. 1986.
  •  159
    Radical externalism or Berkeley revisited?
    Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (7-8): 78-94. 2006.
    Ted Honderich's 'Radical Externalism' concerning the nature of consciousness is a refreshing, and in many ways very appealing, approach to a long- standing and seemingly intractable philosophical conundrum. Although I sympathize with many of his motivations in advancing the theory and share his hostility for certain alternative approaches that are currently popular, I will serve him better by playing devil's advocate than by simply recording my points of agreement with him. If his theory is a go…Read more
    Ted Honderich's 'Radical Externalism' concerning the nature of consciousness is a refreshing, and in many ways very appealing, approach to a long- standing and seemingly intractable philosophical conundrum. Although I sympathize with many of his motivations in advancing the theory and share his hostility for certain alternative approaches that are currently popular, I will serve him better by playing devil's advocate than by simply recording my points of agreement with him. If his theory is a good one, it should be able to stand up to the strongest criticisms that we can muster against it. I shall do my best to articulate some of those criticisms as forcefully as I can.
    Internalism and Externalism about ExperienceBerkeley: SkepticismBerkeley: Immaterialism
  •  156
    ‘if A And B, Then A’
    Analysis 45 (1): 93-98. 1985.
    Conditionals
  •  280
    Mumford and Anjum on causal necessitarianism and antecedent strengthening
    Analysis 72 (4): 731-735. 2012.
    Stephen Mumford and Rani Lill Anjum have recently attacked causal necessitarianism – the doctrine that causes necessitate their effects – on the grounds that causation does not survive what they describe as the test of antecedent strengthening. This article shows that there are credible conditional logics which do not sanction this test, thereby providing an escape route for proponents of causal necessitarianism from Mumford and Anjum's argument
  •  21
    Booknotes
    Philosophy 64 (n/a): 426. 1989.
  •  73
    The psychology of freedom by Thomas pink. Cambridge university press, 1996, pp. X + 284. £35.00
    Philosophy 73 (2): 305-324. 1998.
    The WillFree Will and Psychology
  •  58
    Philosophical Logic
    . 2007.
    Logics
  •  160
    For Want of a Nail
    Analysis 40 (1). 1980.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback