•  32
    Intentional action
    Noûs 28 (1): 39-68. 1994.
    We shall formulate an analysis of the ordinary notion of intentional action that clarifies a commonsense distinction between intentional and nonintentional action. Our analysis will build on some typically neglected considerations about relations between lucky action and intentional action. It will highlight the often- overlooked role of evidential considerations in intentional action, thus identifying the key role of certain epistemological considerations in action theory. We shall also explain…Read more
  •  17
    Libertarianism, luck, and control
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3): 381-407. 2005.
    This article critically examines recent work on free will and moral responsibility by Randolph Clarke, Robert Kane, and Timothy O’Connor in an attempt to clarify issues about control and luck that are central to the debate between libertarians (agent causationists and others) and their critics. It is argued that luck poses an as yet unresolved problem for libertarians.
  •  1
    CHAPTER 3. Self-Deception without Puzzles
    In Self-Deception Unmasked, Princeton University Press. pp. 50-75. 2001.
  •  19
    Situationism and Agency
    Journal of Practical Ethics 1 (1): 62-83. 2013.
    Research in psychology indicates that situations powerfully impact human behavior. Often, it seems, features of situations drive our behavior even when we remain unaware of these features or their influence. One response to this research is pessimism about human agency: human agents have little conscious control over their own behavior, and little insight into why they do what they do. In this paper we review classic and more recent studies indicating “the power of the situation,” and argue for …Read more
  •  5
    Flickers of Freedom (review)
    Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (2): 144-156. 1998.
  •  7
    Free will: Theories, analysis, and data
    In Susan Pockett (ed.), Does consciousness cause behaviour?, Mit Press. pp. 187-205. 2004.
    Alfred Mele develops a conceptual analysis of some of the concepts that inform the recent experimental studies of intentional action. Based on a distinction between unconscious urge and conscious decision, he suggests that the neural activity described by Libet’s experiments may represent an urge to move rather than a decision to do so, and that the decision to move might be made only when the subject becomes conscious of the urge. If this is the case, then Libet’s experiments do not threaten fr…Read more
  •  2
    Aristotle on the Roles of Reason in Motivation and Justification
    Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 66 (22). 1984.
    In this paper I shall attempt to answer to questions about the relationship, in Aristotle's ethical thought and the practical intellect to practical ends. The first is a question about motivation, and second is a question about justification. I shall argue that the practical intellect has important work to do in both connections.
  •  47
    On “Happiness and the Good Life”
    Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10 (2): 181-187. 1979.
  •  8
    Justifying intentions
    Mind 102 (406): 335-337. 1993.
    In his "Purposive Intending" T.L.M. Pink (1991) instructively criticized a popular view about intentions and advanced an alternative position of his own. I challenged a pair of theses to which Pink's position committed him (Mele 1992a). Pink now agrees that both theses are false. His mistake, he says, was to express his view in terms of reasons; his position is now to be framed in terms of "justifications" (1993).
  •  11
    Recent Work on Intentional Action
    American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (3). 1992.
    Central to the philosophy of action is a concern to understand intentional action. Two pertinent questions may be distinguished. What is it to do something intentionally? How is intentional behavior to be explained? Although, ideally, a review of recent work in the philosophy of action would attend equally to both questions, space does not permit my doing justice to both here. I shall focus on the definitional or conceptual issue and examine work on the explanatory issue only insofar as it sheds…Read more
  •  16
    Rational Intentions and the Toxin Puzzle
    Proto Sociology 8 39-52. 1996.
    Gregory Kavka’s toxin puzzle has spawned a lively literature about the nature of intention and of rational intention in particular. This paper is largely a critique of a pair of recent responses to the puzzle that focus on the connection between rationally forming an intention to A and rationally A-ing, one by David Gauthier and the other by Edward McClennen. It also critically assesses the two main morals Kavka takes reflection on the puzzle to support, morals about the nature of intention and …Read more
  •  4
    Free Will and Consciousness: An Introduction and Overview of Perspectives
    with Kathleen Vohs and Roy Baumeister
    In Al Mele, Kathleen Vohs & Roy Baumeister (eds.), Free Will and Consciousness: How Might They Work? (New York: OUP, 2010), Oxford University Press. 2010.
    This volume is aimed at readers who wish to move beyond debates about the existence of free will and the efficacy of consciousness and closer to appreciating how free will and consciousness might operate. It draws from philosophy and psychology, the two fields that have grappled most fundamentally with these issues. In this wide-ranging volume, the contributors explore such issues as how free will is connected to rational choice, planning, and self-control; roles for consciousness in decision ma…Read more
  •  18
    Review of The Rationality of Emotion (review)
    Philosophical Books 30 (1): 39-40. 1989.
    A book review of Ronald de Sousa's The Rationality of Emotion.
  •  8
    Moral Responsibility: Radical Reversals and Original Designs
    The Journal of Ethics 20 (1-3): 69-82. 2016.
    This article identifies and assesses a way of thinking that might help to explain why some compatibilists are attracted to what is variously called an internalist, structuralist, or anti-historicist view of moral responsibility—a view about the bearing of agents’ histories on their moral responsibility. Scenarios of two different kinds are considered. Several scenarios feature heavy-duty manipulation that radically changes an agent’s mature moral personality from admirable to despicable or vice …Read more
  •  3
    Intention and Literature
    Stanford French Review 16 173-196. 1992.
    The issues of authorial intentions and interpretations are discussed. The philosophical dispute between metaphysical realists and metaphysical antirealists on authorial intentions and how these are characterized is examined. While realists maintain that a mind-independent reality exists, antirealists claim that reality is completely mind-dependent and that all things are mere mental constructions.
  •  5
    Folk conceptions of intentional action
    Philosophical Issues 22 (1): 281-297. 2012.
    Studies designed to help us understand how nonspecialists conceive of intentional action have generated some widely discussed results. To what extent are the results accounted for by the existence of different folk conceptions of intentional action? That is my guiding question in this article. I am not in a position to offer a full answer, but I do hope to make some progress.
  •  9
    Testing free will
    Neuroethics 3 (2): 161-172. 2008.
    This article describes three experiments that would advance our understanding of the import of data already generated by scientific work on free will and related issues. All three can be conducted with existing technology. The first concerns how reliable a predictor of behavior a certain segment of type I and type II RPs is. The second focuses on the timing of conscious experiences in Libet-style studies. The third concerns the effectiveness of conscious implementation intentions. The discussion…Read more
  •  16
    Agency and mental action
    Philosophical Perspectives 11 231-249. 1997.
    My question here is whether there are intentional mental actions that generate special, significant threats to causalism (i.e., threats of a kind not generated by intentional overt actions), or that generate, more poi- gnantly, problems for causalism that some intentional overt actions allegedly generate, as well.
  •  4
    Moral Psychology
    In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics, Continuum. pp. 98. 2011.
    This chapter focuses on a pair of topics in moral psychology that are linked to motivation and evaluation: weakness of will and first-person moral ought beliefs.
  •  1
    Incontinent Belief
    Journal of Philosophical Research 16 197-212. 1991.
    Brian McLaughlin, in “Incontinent Belief” (Journal of Philosophical Research 15 [1989-90], pp. 115-26), takes issue with my investigation, in lrrationality (Oxford University Press, 1987), of a doxastic analogue of akratic action. He deems what I term “strict akratic belief” philosophically uninteresting. In the present paper, I explain that this assessment rests on a serious confusion about the sort of possibility that is at issue in my chapter on the topic, correct a variety of misimpressions,…Read more
  •  2
    Another Scientific Threat to Free Will?
    The Monist 95 (3): 422-440. 2012.
    In Effective Intentions: The Power of Conscious Will (Mele 2009), I argue that scientists—neuroscientists and others—have not proved that free will is an illusion and have not produced powerful evidence for that claim. Manuel Vargas has suggested that in that book I ignore a serious scientific threat to free will (2009). The alleged threat is identified in section 1. It is the topic of this article.
  •  2
    Rational irrationality
    The Philosophers' Magazine 26 (26): 31-32. 2004.
    Alfred Mele argues we shouldn't try too hard to rid ourselves of all delusions.
  •  7
  •  2
    Discussion – Velleman on Action and Agency (review)
    Philosophical Studies 121 (3): 249-261. 2004.
  •  11
    Self-control, motivational strength, and exposure therapy
    Philosophical Studies 170 (2): 359-375. 2014.
    Do people sometimes exercise self-control in such a way as to bring it about that they do not act on present-directed motivation that continues to be motivationally strongest for a significant stretch of time (even though they are able to act on that motivation at the time) and intentionally act otherwise during that stretch of time? This paper explores the relative merits of two different theories about synchronic self-control that provide different answers to this question. One is due to Sripa…Read more