-
2The Limits of Tolerance: Carnap’s Logico-Philosophical Project in Logical SyntaxProceedings of Aristotelian Society 67--82. 1994.
-
Tolerating Semantics: Carnap’s Philosophical Point of ViewIn Carsten Klein & Steven Awodey (eds.), Carnap Brought Home - The View from Jena, Open Court. pp. 63--78. 2004.
-
‘The Tenacious, Malleable, Indefatigible, and Yet, Eternally Modifiable Will’: Hans Reichenbach’s Knowing SubjectProceedings of Aristotelian Society 79. 2005.
-
2Nicholas Griffin, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell (review)Philosophy in Review 24 (3): 184-187. 2004.
-
Epistemology Purified: Objectivity, Logic, and Experience in Carnap's "Aufbau"Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago. 1990.On the standard interpretation, Carnap's Der logische Aufbau der Welt amounts to a highly derivative work--a rigorous thinking through of Russell's External World program. This dissertation offers a different interpretation of the Aufbau that stresses the importance of Carnap's own epistemological program and is, it is argued, more consistent with the text and Carnap's other early works. Great importance is placed on Carnap's avowed aim of providing an explanation of the objectivity of knowledge…Read more
-
60How Not to Russell Carnap's AufbauPSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 3-14. 1990.On the standard interpretation Rudolf Carnap's Der logische Aufbau der Welt amounts to a highly derivative work-a rigorous thinking through of Russell's External World program. An examination of the aims and methods of logical analysis reveals significant differences between the epistemologies of Russell and Carnap, however. It is argued that Russell's reliance on acquaintance makes logical analysis subservient to empiricist epistemic concerns while Carnap is determined to carry out a broadly Ka…Read more
-
52The Epistemic Agent in Logical PositivismAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 73-105. 2005.[ Alan W. Richardson] This essay explores the uses that Michael Friedman and Bas van Fraassen have recently made of the work of Hans Reichenbach. It uses Friedman's work to complicate van Fraassen's invocation of Reichenbach's voluntarism in support of empiricism. It uses van Fraassen's work to motivate a concern with Friedman's neo-Kantian reading of Reichenbach. We are, finally, left with questions about the status and content of the account of the epistemic subject available to an epistemolog…Read more
-
From Epistemology to the Logic of Science: Carnap’s Philosophy of Empirical Knowledge in the 1930sIn Ronald N. Giere & Alan W. Richardson (eds.), Origins of Logical Empiricism. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVI, Univ of Minnesota Press. pp. 309--332. 1996.
-
39The Geometry of Knowledge: Lewis, Becker, Carnap and the Formalization of Philosophy in the 1920sStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1): 165-182. 2003.On an ordinary view of the relation of philosophy of science to science, science serves only as a topic for philosophical reflection, reflection that proceeds by its own methods and according to its own standards. This ordinary view suggests a way of writing a global history of philosophy of science that finds substantially the same philosophical projects being pursued across widely divergent scientific eras. While not denying that this view is of some use regarding certain themes of and particu…Read more
-
19Carnap on Unity of ScienceIn Alan W. Richardson & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Interpreting Carnap: Critical Essays, Cambridge University Press. 2024.It is no secret that various versions of logical empiricism argued for the importance of unified science. Carnap was a proponent of unity of science views, although he expressed this in different idioms at different times. In the Aufbau (1928) he spoke of the unity of the object domain secured through definability in the constitutional system, in his physicalist period he argued that a physicalist language could serve as the universal language of science, and in his mature philosophical work he …Read more
-
26Logical Empiricism as Scientific PhilosophyCambridge University Press. 2024.This Element offers a new account of the philosophical significance of logical empiricism that relies on the past forty years of literature reassessing the project. It argues that while logical empiricism was committed to empiricism and did become tied to the trajectory of analytic philosophy, neither empiricism nor logical analysis per se was the deepest philosophical commitment of logical empiricism. That commitment was, rather, securing the scientific status of philosophy, bringing philosophy…Read more
-
1Interpreting Carnap: Critical Essays (edited book)Cambridge University Press. 2024.A comprehensive, systematic, and historical collection of essays on Rudolf Carnap's philosophy and legacy, written by leading international experts. This volume provides a redressing of Carnap's place in the history of analytic philosophy, through his approach to metaphysics, values, politics, epistemology and philosophy of science.
-
50Introduction: Objectivity in ScienceIn Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.), Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives From Science and Technology Studies, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Vol. 310. Springer. pp. 1-15. 2015.
-
20Reviews (review)Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 7 347-363. 1999.Richardson’s study on Carnap’s early philosophy culminating in Der logische Aufbau der Welt of 1928 ,presents a comprehensive and sustained effort at understanding it as deeply rooted in neo-Kantian patterns of thought: thus it belongs to a more recent tradition of viewing the emergence of Carnap’s thought, alternative to the older approach of interpreting it against the background of empiricist themes, and well deserves to be labelled the most thoroughgoing expression this more recent tradition…Read more
-
10How not to Russell Carnap’s AufbauPSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (1): 2-14. 1990.Rudolf Carnap is principally renowned for stating with remarkable precision and rigor a rich variety of philosophical doctrines — doctrines which, thanks mainly to Carnap’s meticulous formulations, the philosophical world now holds to be clearly and fundamentally mistaken. Thus, it is Carnap who, in Meaning and Necessity (Carnap 1947), presents in detail the linguistic doctrine of logical truth and the semantic underpinnings of the analytic/synthetic distinction, providing thereby the grist for …Read more
-
46Logical Empiricism in North America (edited book)Univ of Minnesota Press. 2003."An essential overview of an important intellectual movement, Logical Empiricism in North America offers the first significant, sustained, and multidisciplinary attempt to understand the intellectual, cultural, and political dimensions of ...
-
13Logical Empiricism is commonly regarded as uninterested in, if not hostile to sociological investigations of science. This paper reconstructs the views of Otto Neurath and Philipp Frank on the legitimacy and relevance of sociological investigations of theory choice. It is argued that while there obtains a surprising degree of convergence between their programmatic pronouncements and the Strong Programme, the two types of project nevertheless remain distinct. The key to this difference lies in th…Read more
-
52A Critical Context For Longino’s Critical Contextual EmpiricismStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1): 211-222. 2005.
-
3Songs of Experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme (review)Isis 97 (1): 196-197. 2006.
-
103Science as Will and Representation: Carnap, Reichenbach, and the Sociology of SciencePhilosophy of Science 67 (3): 162. 2000.This essay explores some of the issues raised as regards the relations of philosophy and sociology of science in the work of Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach. It argues that Hans Reichenbach's distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification should not be seen as erecting a principled normative/descriptive distinction that demarcates philosophy of science from sociology of science. The essay also raises certain issues about the role of volition, decision, and the limits of epist…Read more
-
68
-
49Review of The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station by Alberto Coffa (review)Philosophy of Science 61 (1): 142-144. 1994.
-
18Reichenbach’s Disease and Mirowski’s Theory of Knowledge? Or, Will to Power as Philosophy of ScienceStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4): 744-753. 2005.
-
29Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence DebatePhilosophical Books 35 (3): 180-182. 1994.
-
8Nicholas Griffin., Russell's Idealist Apprenticeship; Peter Hylton, Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy (review)International Studies in Philosophy 26 (2): 121-123. 1994.
-
39Metaphysics and Idealism in the AufbauGrazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1): 45-72. 1992.The received view of the anti-metaphysics of Camap's Aufbau finds that it rests exclusively on verificationism. Alberto Coffa has recently put forward an interpretation of the antimetaphysical stance that claims that Camap was confusedly moving from ontological to semantical ideahsm. After raising objections to both of these views another interpretation is put forward. The crucial aspect of Camap's rejection of metaphysics rests on his reinterpretation of epistemology as the logic of objective k…Read more
-
52Engineering Philosophy of Science: American Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism in the 1930sPhilosophy of Science 69 (S3). 2002.This essay examines logical empiricism and American pragmatism, arguing that American philosophy's embrace of logical empiricism in the 1930s was not a turning away from Dewey's pragmatism. It places both movements within scientific philosophy and finds two key points on which they agreed: their revolutionary ambitions and their social engineering sensibility. The essay suggests that the disagreement over emotivism in ethics should be placed within the context of a larger issue on which the move…Read more