-
Knowledge, certainty, and understanding are all plausible candidates for constituting aims and setting the norms for genuine inquiry. However, a mere pluralist account of aims and norms of inquiry that lacks a more fundamental theoretical motivation might strike us as ad hoc. The aim of this paper is to provide further motivation for a pluralist approach. The key to the solution is to regard finding sufficient reasons to believe as a more general, indeed unifying, aim of theoretical inquiry.Inquiry and reasonsSynthese 204 (2): 1-26. 2024. -
This paper explores one way in which the view that emotions can be epistemically justified stands in tension with two common views in epistemology; namely, that doxastic justification entails propositional justification, and that propositional justification is entirely determined by the (inferential) support relations between one's evidence and a given proposition. A tentative solution to the tension is provided.Evidence and EmotionsAmerican Philosophical Quarterly 61 (2): 99-108. 2024. -
Normative Reasons: Between Reasoning and ExplanationCambridge University Press. 2022.Reasons matter greatly to us in both ordinary and theoretical contexts, being connected to two fundamental normative concerns: figuring out what we should do and what attitudes to have, and understanding the duties and responsibilities that apply to us. This book introduces and critiques most of the contemporary theories of normative reasons considerations that speak in favor of an action, belief, or emotion - to explore how they work. Artūrs Logins develops and defends a new theory: the Eroteti…Read more
-
Université LavalAssistant Professor
APA Eastern Division
Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Areas of Specialization
| Epistemology |
| Meta-Ethics |