Carien Smith

Abstract:Catastrophe has increasingly become a consumer product. Perhaps because of this, we have become desensitised to the idea of catastrophe, so much so that narratives that should elicit fear and anxiety due to their reflecting a truth about our current world do not causally produce the necessary affective responses that would motivate us to act. This is the case with climate change. Through a superficial engagement with the climate change issue through social media, media, films, television, and other literature, we experience catharsis daily. The release of the fear and anxiety that should lead us to action against climate change does not make us act against it. In this article, I put forth this argument by discussing how we superficially interact with climate change and catastrophe through the media, social media, films, television, and other literature. I refer to empirical evidence that supports my position. I consider how this superficial interaction leads to desensitization and causally produces a catharsis, leading to inaction. I put forth some initial remarks on how artmaking could be approached in a way that does not desensitize us to catastrophe by considering what Heidegger, Adorno, and Marcuse have to say about the function and origin of art.

“Everything is a lie … Nothing is a lie” From reviews: Jan Rabie’s short fiction collection 21 in the sixties was a sign of renewal, and it was the beginning of an era of unprecedented growth in local as well as Afrikaans literature and I hope this book can do the same – Koos Kombuis An artful masterpiece – Anschen Conradie To fly with a solo debut, that Smith does convincingly – Joan Hambidge About: This fictional work explores various philosophical ideas, from AI, climate change justice, technology and its ethical complications, to the ideas of clones and robots and their position in society as, plausibly, citizens with full "human rights".