-
29Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology (edited book)Edward Elgar Publishers. 2011.Practitioners in the vanguard of new economic thinking will also find plenty of useful information in this path-breaking book.
-
25Introduction: economic methodology and philosophy of economics twenty years since the MillenniumJournal of Economic Methodology 28 (1): 1-2. 2021.The papers in this special symposium issue of the Journal of Economic Methodology advance a variety of perspectives on the current state and possible future development of economic methodology and...
-
48Introduction: Methodology, systemic risk, and the economics professionJournal of Economic Methodology 20 (1). 2013.(2013). Introduction: Methodology, systemic risk, and the economics profession. Journal of Economic Methodology: Vol. 20, Methodology, Systemic Risk, and the Economics Profession, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1080/1350178X.2013.774842
-
15Piaget as a Visionary Thinker (review)Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 19 (1): 113-114. 1988.
-
13Review of Conrad Heilmann and Julian Reiss’ (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. New York, NY: Routledge, 2022, xvi + 516 pp (review)Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 16 (1). 2023.
-
4The many faces of unification and pluralism in economics: The case of Paul Samuelson's Foundations of Economic AnalysisStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (C): 209-219. 2021.
-
6History, Methodology and Identity for a 21st Century Social Economics (edited book)Routledge. 2019.This book seeks to advance social economic analysis, economic methodology, and the history of economic thought in the context of twenty-first century scholarship and socio-economic concerns. Bringing together carefully selected chapters by leading scholars it examines the central contributions that John Davis has made to various areas of scholarship. In recent decades, criticisms of mainstream economics have rekindled interest in a number of areas of scholarly inquiry that were frequently ignore…Read more
-
10Economic Methodology in the Twenty-First Century (So Far): Some Post-Reflection ReflectionsRevue de Philosophie Économique 20 (2): 221-252. 2020.
-
12Economic Methodology in the Twenty-First Century (So Far): Some Post-Reflection ReflectionsRevue de Philosophie Économique 20 (2): 221-252. 2020.
-
53Derivational robustness, credible substitute systems and mathematical economic models: the case of stability analysis in Walrasian general equilibrium theoryEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (1): 31-53. 2016.This paper supports the literature which argues that derivational robustness can have epistemic import in highly idealized economic models. The defense is based on a particular example from mathematical economic theory, the dynamic Walrasian general equilibrium model. It is argued that derivational robustness first increased and later decreased the credibility of the Walrasian model. The example demonstrates that derivational robustness correctly describes the practices of a particular group of …Read more
-
27Orthodox and heterodox economics in recent economic methodologyErasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 8 (1): 61. 2015.This paper discusses the development of the field of economic methodology during the last few decades emphasizing the early influence of the "shelf" of Popperian philosophy and the division between neoclassical and heterodox economics. It argues that the field of methodology has recently adopted a more naturalistic approach focusing primarily on the "new pluralist" subfields of experimental economics, behavioral economics, neuroeconomics, and related subjects.
-
48Blurred boundaries: Recent changes in the relationship between economics and the philosophy of natural scienceStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5): 751-772. 1994.
-
3Priority Fights in Economic Science: Paradox and ResolutionPerspectives on Science 14 (2): 215-231. 2006.Eponymic honor is a common form of professional recognition in economics, as it is in other sciences. There also seems to be convincing evidence that individuals exposed to economic theory behave less cooperatively and more self-interestedly than individuals who have not been exposed to such economic ideas. Taken together these two facts would seem to suggest that the history of economic thought would be a history of rather contentious priority fights. If economists generally behave in self-inte…Read more
-
70Reconsidering the received view of the 'Received View': Kant, Kuhn, and the demise of positivist philosophy of scienceSocial Epistemology 17 (2-3): 169-173. 2003.This Article does not have an abstract
-
419Priority Fights in Economic Science: Paradox and ResolutionPerspectives on Science 14 (2): 215-231. 2006.: Eponymic honor is a common form of professional recognition in economics, as it is in other sciences. There also seems to be convincing evidence that individuals exposed to economic theory behave less cooperatively and more self-interestedly than individuals who have not been exposed to such economic ideas. Taken together these two facts would seem to suggest that the history of economic thought would be a history of rather contentious priority fights. If economists generally behave in self-in…Read more
-
446The logical reconstruction of pure exchange economics: Another alternativeTheory and Decision 19 (3): 259-278. 1985.
-
300Metaphysics, Economics and Progress: A Comment on Glass and JohnsonBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2): 241-244. 1992.
-
917 The more things change, the more they stay the same: social realism in contemporary science studiesIn Uskali Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction, Cambridge University Press. pp. 341. 2002.
-
3The Positive-Normative Dichotomy and EconomicsIn Uskali Mäki (ed.), Philosophy of Economics, Elsevier. pp. 219-39. 2012.
-
10Reflecting on Three Reviews of Reflection Without RulesJournal of Economic Methodology 10 551-559. 2003.This paper is the author's response to three reviews of "Reflection Without Rules."
-
5522006 HES Presidential Address: A Tale of Two Mainstreams: Economics and Philosophy of Natural Science in the mid-Twentieth CenturyJournal of the History of Economic Thought 29 1-13. 2007.Abstract: The paper argues that mainstream economics and mainstream philosophy of natural science had much in common during the period 1945-1965. It examines seven common features of the two fields and suggests a number of historical developments that might help explain these similarities. The historical developments include: the Vienna Circle connection, the Samuelson-Harvard-Foundations connection, and the Cold War operations research connection.
-
22Introduction to Symposium on Terence Hutchison and Economic MethodologyJournal of Economic Methodology 16 (3): 277-281. 2009.The article presents the author's perspectives regarding the book "The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory," by Terence Wilmot Hutchison. He emphasizes two important general themes that emerge from the symposium in total, the great breadth of Hutchison's contribution to economic methodology and a brief introduction on the four individual papers. He mentions some people including Roger Backhouse, John Hart and Ross Emmett as well as the comments of each about Hutchison's works.
-
904Caveat emptor: Economics and contemporary philosophy of sciencePhilosophy of Science 64 (4): 116. 1997.The relationship between economics and the philosophy of natural science has changed substantially during the last few years. What was once exclusively a one-way relationship from philosophy to economics now seems to be much closer to bilateral exchange. The purpose of this paper is to examine this new relationship. First, I document the change. Second, I examine the situation within contemporary philosophy of science in order to explain why economics might have its current appeal. Third, I cons…Read more
-
72What economics is not: An economist's response to RosenbergPhilosophy of Science 51 (3): 495-503. 1984.Alexander Rosenberg (1983) has argued, contrary to his previous work in the philosophy of economics, that economics is not science, and it is merely mathematics. The following paper argues that Rosenberg fails to demonstrate either of these two claims. The questions of the predictive weakness of modern economics and the cognitive standing of abstract economic theory are discussed in detail
-
67Social Epistemology Meets the Invisible Hand: Kitcher on the Advancement of ScienceDialogue 34 (3): 605-. 1995.
-
596Popper, the Rationality Principle and Economic ExplanationIn G. K. Shaw (ed.), Economics, Culture, and Education: Essays in Honor of Mark Blaug, Edward Elgar. pp. 108-119. 1991.
-
49Normative ecological rationality: normative rationality in the fast-and-frugal-heuristics research programJournal of Economic Methodology 21 (4): 396-410. 2014.The purpose of this paper is to examine the normative interpretation of the fast-and-frugal research program and in particular to contrast it with the normative reading of rational choice theory and behavioral economics. The ecological rationality of fast-and-frugal heuristics is admittedly a form of normative naturalism – it derives what agents “ought” to do from that which “is” ecologically rational – and the paper will examine how this differs from the normative rationality associated with ra…Read more
-
122Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference TheoryErkenntnis 78 (5): 1081-1108. 2013.This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how th…Read more
Tacoma, Washington, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Social Science |
20th Century Philosophy |
General Philosophy of Science |
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Social Science |
General Philosophy of Science |