• A strike against a striking principle
    Philosophical Studies 177 (6): 1501-1514. 2020.
    Several authors believe that there are certain facts that are striking and cry out for explanation—for instance, a coin that is tossed many times and lands in the alternating sequence HTHTHTHTHTHT…. According to this view, we have prima facie reason to believe that such facts are not the result of chance. I call this view the striking principle. Based on this principle, some have argued for far-reaching conclusions, such as that our universe was created by intelligent design, that there are many…Read more
  • A reliability challenge to theistic Platonism
    Analysis 77 (3): 479-487. 2017.
    doi:10.1093/analys/anx089.
  • Calling for Explanation
    Oxford University Press. 2022.
    The idea that there are some facts that call for explanation serves as an unexamined premise in influential arguments for the inexistence of moral or mathematical facts and for the existence of a god and of other universes. This book is the first to offer a comprehensive and critical treatment of this idea. It argues that calling for explanation is a sometimes-misleading figure of speech rather than a fundamental property of facts.