-
158For They Do Not Agree In Nature: Spinoza and Deep EcologyEthics and the Environment 18 (1): 43-65. 2013.In the Ethics,1 Spinoza presents a rigorous naturalistic view of man and nature. Man is a part of nature, a subject of the same domain—not a domain separate from it, nor a domain within that of nature. Man cannot act against nature or in an unnatural way; in comparison with any other part or creature of nature, man is not special, more important or qualitatively different. All general laws of nature apply equally to animals, inanimate objects, humans, God, the mind, and the affects. Nature can b…Read more
-
2On The Relative Repugnance of Organ MarketsIn Proceedings of the International Applied Ethics Conference, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 21-23 November 2008, Center For Applied Ethics and Philosophy (caep) Hokkaido University. pp. 153-164. 2008.
-
Michel J. BeheIn Roger Chapman (ed.), Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints, and Voices, M.e. Sharpe. pp. 39-40. 2010.
-
19Review - Debating Design From Darwin to DNA by William A. Dembski and Michael Ruse (Editors) Cambridge University Press, 2004 (review)Metapsychology Online Reviews 10 (3). 2006.
-
44Richard A. Richards. The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. x+236. $85.00 (review)Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4 (1): 169-172. 2014.
Bridgewater, Massachusetts, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Biomedical Ethics |
Medical Ethics |
Environmental Ethics |
Species |
Philosophy of Medicine |