-
Data and explanationsIn Ernest LePore (ed.), New directions in semantics, Academic Press. pp. 2--1. 1987.
-
The autonomy of syntax and semanticsIn J. L. Garfield (ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding, Mit Press. 1987.
-
23Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed ProcessingPhilosophical Quarterly 44 (174): 112-115. 1994.
-
14
-
55Is Semantics Necessary?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88 (1): 219-242. 1988.James Higginbotham; XIII*—Is Semantics Necessary?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 88, Issue 1, 1 June 1988, Pages 219–242, https://doi.org/10.1.
-
McGinn's LogicismsAnalytica 3 109-119. 2009.Russian translation of Higginbotham J. McGinn's Logicisms // Philosophical Issues, 4, 1993. Translated by Kristina Goncharenko with kind permission of the author.
-
On Knowing One's Own LanguageIn Michael McKinsey (ed.), On Knowing Our Own Minds, Wiley-blackwell. 2002.
-
38On Referential Semantics and Cognitive ScienceIn João Branquinho (ed.), The Foundations of Cognitive Science, Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 145. 2001.
-
2Frege, Concepts, and the Design of LanguageIn Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Information, Semantics and Epistemology, Blackwell. pp. 153--171. 1990.
-
9
-
2Perceptual reports revisitedIn K. Murasugi & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics, Westview Press. 1999.
-
269The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semanticsJournal of Philosophy 80 (February): 100-127. 1983.
-
2On events in linguistic semanticsIn James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi & Achille Varzi (eds.), Speaking of Events, Oxford University Press. 2000.
-
21Comments on J. Hintikka's paper: "Game-theoretical semantics: insights and prospects"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (3): 263-271. 1982.
-
69Jackendoff's conceptualismBehavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6): 680-681. 2003.In this commentary, I concentrate upon Ray Jackendoff's view of the proper foundations for semantics within the context of generative grammar. Jackendoff (2002) favors a form of internalism that he calls “conceptualism.” I argue that a retreat from realism to conceptualism is not only unwarranted, but even self-defeating, in that the issues that prompt his view will inevitably reappear if the latter is adopted.
Los Angeles, California, United States of America