• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Jamie Nelson

Michigan State University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    122
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    77

 More details
  • Michigan State University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Homepage
East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Applied Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Language
Normative Ethics
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
  • All publications (122)
  •  4
    Book review (review)
    with Nancy S. Jecker and Mary Ann Carroll
    Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (2): 271-281. 1993.
  •  21
    Special Responsibilities of Parents Using Technologically Assisted Reproduction
    In Carolyn McLeod & Francoise Baylis (eds.), Family Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges, Oxford University Press. pp. 185-197. 2014.
    In her influential _Maternal Thinking_, Sara Ruddick (1989) suggested that a parent’s responsibilities are to preserve, nurture, and socialize the children in her or his care. This chapter uses Ruddick’s triad as a point of departure for considering whether using technological means to become a parent might generate responsibilities that are different, in intensity or content, from those that parents standardly incur. The goal is to argue that, at least in those cases where those who contribute …Read more
    In her influential _Maternal Thinking_, Sara Ruddick (1989) suggested that a parent’s responsibilities are to preserve, nurture, and socialize the children in her or his care. This chapter uses Ruddick’s triad as a point of departure for considering whether using technological means to become a parent might generate responsibilities that are different, in intensity or content, from those that parents standardly incur. The goal is to argue that, at least in those cases where those who contribute their gametes to the enterprise but do not intend to rear the resulting children, as well as in cases where the use of assisted reproductive technologies make the risks of pregnancy graver for women and their foetuses, the answer is “yes”: preserving, nurturing, and socializing their children are at least likely to be tasks which are unusually complex and exacting.
  •  20
    Field Notes
    Hastings Center Report 36 (1). 2012.
  •  9
    Feminism, Social Policy, and Long‐Acting Contraception
    with Hilde Lindemann Nelson
    Hastings Center Report 25 (1). 2012.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  14
    Preferences and Other Moral Sources
    with Hilde Lindemann Nelson
    Hastings Center Report 24 (6). 2012.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  11
    Transplantation through a Glass Darkly
    Hastings Center Report 22 (5): 6-8. 2012.
    Should baboons become spare parts bins for human beings? Not when their moral nature remains a mystery to us.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  15
    Partialism and Parenthood
    Journal of Social Philosophy 21 (1): 107-118. 2008.
  •  12
    At the Center
    Hastings Center Report 21 (1). 2012.
  •  9
    At the Center
    Hastings Center Report 24 (5). 2012.
  •  4
    Moral Teachings from Unexpected Quarters: Lessons for Bioethics from the Social Sciences and Managed Care
    Hastings Center Report 30 (1): 12-17. 2012.
    On the usual account of moral reasoning, social science is often seen as able to provide “just the facts,” while philosophy attends to moral values and conceptual clarity and builds formally valid arguments. Yet disciplines are informed by epistemic values—and bioethics might do well to see social scientific practices and their attendant normative understandings about what is humanly important as a significant part of ethics generally.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  7
    Commentary
    Hastings Center Report 25 (3): 26-27. 2012.
  • Taking Families Seriously
    Hastings Center Report 22 (4): 6-12. 2012.
    Medical decisionmaking would be a messier but better thing if it honored what is morally valuable about patients' families. The concerns of intimates have a legitimate call upon us even when we are ill.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  6
    The Romance of the Family
    with Hilde Lindemann
    Hastings Center Report 38 (4): 19-21. 2012.
  •  5
    Bioethics Education: Expanding the Circle of Participants
    with Daniel Callahan and Barbara C. Thornton
    Hastings Center Report 23 (1): 25-29. 2012.
    Bioethics education now takes place outside universities as well as within them. How should clinicians, ethics committee members, and policymakers be taught the ethics they need, and how may their progress best be evaluated?
  •  1
    Taking Nature's Pulse (review)
    Hastings Center Report 23 (5): 44-44. 2012.
    Book reviewed in this article: Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Ed. Robert Costanza, Bryan G. Norton, and Benjamin D. Haskell.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  6
    Guided by Intimates
    with Hilde Lindemann Nelson
    Hastings Center Report 23 (5): 14-15. 2012.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  4
    What Has History to Do with Me?
    Hastings Center Report 21 (4): 2-2. 2012.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  6
    The Social (De)Construction of Futility (review)
    Hastings Center Report 30 (3): 49-50. 2012.
  •  3
    The Best Laid Plans
    with Ellen H. Moskowitz
    Hastings Center Report 25 (6): 3-5. 2012.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  2
    Introduction
    with Ellen H. Moskowitz
    Hastings Center Report 25 (6): 2-2. 2012.
  •  3
    At the Center
    with Hilde Lindemann Nelson
    Hastings Center Report 25 (4). 2012.
  •  7
    What Do We Know When We Know How to Go On? (review)
    Hastings Center Report 31 (4): 50-51. 2012.
  •  16
    Moral Sensibilities and Moral Standing: Caplan on Xenograft “Donors”
    Bioethics 7 (4): 315-322. 2007.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  98
    Book review (review)
    with Mary Ann Carroll and Nancy S. Jecker
    Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (2): 375-378. 1993.
  •  256
    Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory (edited book)
    with Sandra Lee Bartky, Paul Benson, Sue Campbell, Claudia Card, Robin S. Dillon, Jean Harvey, Karen Jones, Charles W. Mills, Margaret Urban Walker, Rebecca Whisnant, and Catherine Wilson
    Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 2004.
    Moral psychology studies the features of cognition, judgement, perception and emotion that make human beings capable of moral action. Perspectives from feminist and race theory immensely enrich moral psychology. Writers who take these perspectives ask questions about mind, feeling, and action in contexts of social difference and unequal power and opportunity. These essays by a distinguished international cast of philosophers explore moral psychology as it connects to social life, scientific stud…Read more
    Moral psychology studies the features of cognition, judgement, perception and emotion that make human beings capable of moral action. Perspectives from feminist and race theory immensely enrich moral psychology. Writers who take these perspectives ask questions about mind, feeling, and action in contexts of social difference and unequal power and opportunity. These essays by a distinguished international cast of philosophers explore moral psychology as it connects to social life, scientific studies, and literature.
    Feminist EthicsTrustTerrorism
  •  40
    Alzheimer's Disease and Socially Extended Mentation
    In Eva Feder Kittay & Licia Carlson (eds.), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy, Wiley-blackwell. 2010.
    This chapter contains sections titled: Semantic Externalism: A Rough Sketch and a Gesture at Motivation Interests, Values, and the Mind's End Beyond Externalism About Mental Contents Acknowledgments References.
    Alzheimer's Disease
  •  55
    Families and Bioethics: Old Problems, New Themes
    Journal of Clinical Ethics 16 (4): 299-302. 2005.
  •  34
    A Response to Gill
    with Joel Frader
    Journal of Clinical Ethics 15 (4): 289-291. 2004.
  •  25
    "On" the role of the family in resolving bioethical dilemmas: Clinical insights from a family systems perspective"
    Journal of Clinical Ethics 15 (2): 135-138. 2004.
  •  51
    Reasons and Feelings, Duty and Dementia
    Journal of Clinical Ethics 9 (1): 58-65. 1998.
    Ethics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback