Jin Ju Min

This paper analyzes and criticizes Mr. Mou's ontological interpretation Kong Ziren school, then from a post-modern perspective to be re-read that Confucius's "benevolence" is a practical, process and philosophy of infinite open areas, and implied that it is such a "benevolence" achievements of the Chinese culture of tolerance and openness. This eassay critically reviewed Zongsan Mou's ontological Interpretation of Confucius's doctrine of REN, therefore, is readfined as an open-ended category, representing a performance, and a process. It is the REN understood as such that has led the Chinese culture to its openness and all-inclusiveness

Levinas discovered the "infinite otherness," Derrida said: "Levinas's thought can make us tremble." "While shaking his theory to do this makes a certain degree of deconstruction, but still had not reduced its overall shocking in today's globalization intensifies with each day, which implied the same for hegemony and it is still a blockbuster, at least, I think, the modern theory of dialogue it will eventually be From the basis of subversion; basis for dialogue will not be the "heart Similarly with" not "communicative rationality", which also should not be a dialogue in order to "consensus", "communication", "consistency", but "face to face." Let he who is still he who, differences still remain differences. Jacques Derrida felt that Emmanuel Levinas' thought could make readers tremble. Obviously, it is chiefly because Levinas supposed an "Absolutely Other." Although many years passed since Derrida deconstructed this trembling thought, it could still have effects upon us as before. To the hegemony and sameness implied in today's increasing globalization, it is still a heavy bomb. At least, this essay insists, the modern theory of dialogue would be upset from the very basis. For the "absolutely other", the underpinning of dialogue will no longer be such a thesis, "same heart, and so same reason", nor "communicative reason", and therefore the aim for a dialogue will not be "knowledge-sharing", "communication", "agreement", but "face to face ", in which eventually the other is still the other, and difference still difference

Aesthetics of silence is an indisputable international fact. Aesthetics is a positive response when the revival of contemporary social changes. Modernist aesthetic to great effect in "aesthetic" has been in and "social" life and death confrontations. Now, due to "material symbol" as a symbol of the "consumer society" to come, they had a cultural dimension of "social" becomes obvious in the way "culture" of, and it is symbolic, but also the aesthetics, This symbol - means nothing less than the commodity aesthetic logic and electronic media to achieve unprecedented social, then a general "aesthetic community" has impressively in the head. As a theoretical concept, "social aesthetic" because of this new reality and finally rising to the surface history of ideas. That aesthetics has been long dumb is widely acknowledged. A revival of aesthetics can be fulfilled only by its active response to the social changes nowadays. Under the heavy shadow of the Aesthetic Modernism, aesthetics has been since Kant standing in sharp opposition to society. However , Society in the new context of consumer society which features an object-sign is now becoming more and more culturized, ie, signed and simultaneously aestheticized. With the aid of the all-reaching commoditization and electronic media, moreover, this sign-aesthetics acquires its highest sociality it never has had before, and an Aesthetic Society has thus come to the fore. Fostered by this social change, Socio-Aesthetics matures and could jump out of the horizon of the intellectual history