-
27. Modell 1: Freiheit. Zur Metakritik der praktischen Vernunft I. Dialektik der Aufklärung in der Idee der FreiheitIn Theodor W. Adorno (ed.), Theodor W. Adorno: Negative Dialektik, Akademie Verlag. pp. 119-150. 1970.
-
252. DiscourseIn Hauke Brunkhorst, Regina Kreide & Cristina Lafont (eds.), The Habermas handbook, Columbia University Press. pp. 533-537. 2018.
-
14. Juridical DiscoursesIn Hauke Brunkhorst, Regina Kreide & Cristina Lafont (eds.), The Habermas handbook, Columbia University Press. pp. 117-121. 2018.
-
311. Communicative Freedom, Communicative Power, and JurisgenesisIn Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, Univ of California Press. pp. 234-254. 1998.
-
7Krisenmomente der FreiheitArchiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 107 (3): 330-355. 2021.The article first sketches a panorama of contrasting crisis-like processes that currently characterize the general understanding of freedom, such as the increase in restrictions on freedom against the background of man-made environmental changes, the strengthening of the freedom to dispose of one’s own life in the discussion on assisted suicide, the development of more complex views of the biological nature of human beings and their freedom, the disavowal of the connection between freedom and re…Read more
-
10Jürgen Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and DemocracyRoutledge. 2011.Jurgen Habermas is widely regarded as one of the outstanding intellectuals. This title focuses on the theory of law which can be distilled from his vast compendium of work. It places this theory in the context of Habermas' overall contribution to the theory of society, political theory and social philosophy.
-
77Legal Adjudication and Democracy: Some Remarks on Dworkin and HabermasEuropean Journal of Philosophy 3 (1): 36-54. 1995.
-
31Justification et application universalistes de la norme en droit et en moraleArchives de Philosophie du Droit 37 269-302. 1992.La théorie de l'argumentation montre que le raisonnement pratique s'exerce selon deux modalités : la justification de la validité d'une norme générale et la justification de la pertinence de l'application d'une norme générale au cas d'espèce. Le jugement d'application est le produit d'une argumentation commandée par une exigence d'impartialité. Cette exigence se traduit dans le principe procédural selon lequel on ne peut établir qu'une norme peut légitimement s'appliquer dans une situation que s…Read more
-
53The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and LawState University of New York Press. 1993.In the third and fourth parts of the book, Günther shows--in debate with Hare, Dworkin, and others--how argumentation on the appropriate application of norms and principles in morality and law is possible.
-
10Verantwortung in vernetzten SystemenIn Gerhard Gamm (ed.), Unbestimmtheitssignaturen der Technik, Transcript Verlag. pp. 337-352. 2005.
-
2Verantwortung in vernetzten SystemenIn Andreas Hetzel & Gerhard Gamm (eds.), Unbestimmtheitssignaturen der Technik. Eine neue Deutung der technisierten Welt, Transcript. pp. 337-352. 2005.
-
25Impartial application of moral and legal norms: A contribution to discourse ethics 1Philosophy and Social Criticism 14 (3-4): 425-432. 1988.
-
21III. Zur Rekonstruktion des Rechts : Das System der RechteIn Christian Hiebaum & Peter Koller (eds.), Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung, Walter De Gruyter Gmbh & Co Kg. pp. 51-68
-
DiskursIn Hauke Brunkhorst, Regina Kreide & Cristina Lafont (eds.), Habermas-Handbuch, Metzler. pp. 303--306. 2009.
-
3Ein normativer Begriff der Kohärenz für eine Theorie der juristischen Argumentation”Rechtstheorie 20 (1989): 163-190. 1989.
-
3Besser sehen durch einen SchleierIn Gerhard Gamm & Jens Kertscher (eds.), Philosophie in Experimenten: Versuche explorativen Denkens, Transcript. pp. 203-234. 2011.
-
49Dialektik der Aufklärung in der Idee der Freiheit. Zur Kritik des Freiheitsbegriffs bei AdornoZeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 39 (2). 1985.
-
20Ethische Selbstkontrolle statt Recht? Regulierungsprobleme des WissenschaftssystemsIn Katja Becker, Eva-Maria Engelen & Milos Vec (eds.), Ethisierung - Ethikferne: Wie Viel Ethik Braucht Die Wissenschaft?, De Gruyter. pp. 196-206. 2003.
-
2Ciudadano cosmopolita entre libertad y seguridadIn Gustavo Leyva & Víctor Alarcón (eds.), La Teoría Crítica y Las Tareas Actuales de la Crítica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa, División De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades. pp. 353--374. 2005.
-
9Differenzierungen im Begriff der praktischen Vernunft Zu Jürgen Habermas' "Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik"ProtoSociology 4 184-190. 1993.
-
4Individuelle Zurechnung im demokratischen VerfassungsstaatJahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 2. 1994.In a constitutional democracy, the imputation of a legal violation to an individual must be related to the fact that democratic approval of a norm - under limiting conditions - is coupled with the obligation to follow that norm. The neutrality of modern law toward the quality of motives for following a norm, however, challenges the assumption of such a connection. This challenge is overlooked by those who take the position that individual imputation should be based on the morally autonomous indi…Read more
-
64Critical Remarks on Robert Alexy's "Special-Case Thesis"Ratio Juris 6 (2): 143-156. 1993.In this paper the author criticizes the way Robert Alexy reconstructs the relationship between legal and practical reasoning. The core of Alexy's argumentation (Alexy 1978) is considered the claim that legal argumentation is a “special case” of general practical discourse. In order to question this claim, the author analyzes three different types of argument: (1) that legal reasoning is needed by general practical discourse itself, (2) that there are similarities between legal argumentation and …Read more
-
66A Normative Conception of Coherence for a Discursive Theory of Legal JustificationRatio Juris 2 (2): 155-166. 1989.The author introduces a normative conception of coherence, derived from a pragmatic interpretation of the application of norms to concrete cases. A distinction is made between the justification of a norm and its application. In the case of moral norms, justification and application can be analysed as two different discursive procedures which give rise to different aspects of the principle of impartiality. Impartial justification requires a procedure by which all interests concerned are taken int…Read more
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Law |