-
A Return to the Analogy of BeingPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3). 2010.Recently, I’ve championed the doctrine that fundamentally different sorts of things exist in fundamentally different ways.1 On this view, what it is for an entity to be can differ across ontological categories.2 Although historically this doctrine was very popular, and several important challenges to this doctrine have been dealt with, I suspect that contemporary metaphysicians will continue to treat this view with suspicion until it is made clearer when one is warranted in positing different mo…Read more
-
Existence and NumberAnalytic Philosophy 54 (2): 209-228. 2013.The Frege-Russell view is that existence is a second-order property rather than a property of individuals. One of the most compelling arguments for this view is based on the premise that there is an especially close connection between existence and number. The most promising version of this argument is by C.J.F Williams (1981, 1992). In what follows, I argue that this argument fails. I then defend an account according to which both predications of number and existence attribute properties to ind…Read more
-
Degrees of BeingPhilosophers' Imprint 13. 2013.
-
Teleological Suspensions In Fear and TremblingPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2): 425-451. 2018.I focus here on the teleological suspension of the ethical as it appears in Fear and Trembling. A common reading of Fear and Trembling is that it explores whether there are religious reasons for action that settle that one must do an action even when all the moral reasons for action tell against doing it. This interpretation has been contested. But I defend it by showing how the explicit teleological suspension of the ethical mirrors implicit teleological suspensions of the epistemological and p…Read more
-
The principle of sufficient reason and necessitarianismAnalysis 79 (2): 230-236. 2019.Peter van Inwagen presented a powerful argument against the Principle of Sufficient Reason, which I henceforth abbreviate as ‘PSR’. For decades, the consensus was that this argument successfully refuted PSR. However, now a growing consensus holds that van Inwagen’s argument is fatally flawed, at least when ‘sufficient reason’ is understood in terms of ground, for on this understanding, an ineliminable premiss of van Inwagen’s argument is demonstrably false and cannot be repaired. I will argue th…Read more
-
A Philosophical Model of the Relation between Things in Themselves and AppearancesNoûs 49 (4): 643-664. 2013.
-
The Fragmentation of BeingOxford University Press. 2017.
-
Normative Accounts of FundamentalityPhilosophical Issues 27 (1): 167-183. 2017.
-
Syracuse UniversityProfessor
-
University of Notre DameDepartment of PhilosophyWilliam J. and Dorothy K. O'Neill Professor of Philosophy
Syracuse, New York, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics |
20th Century Philosophy |